The Steve Irwin Mosaic Tribute Project

The Deadliest Snakes in the World

October 17, 2006 · 294 Comments

And an alarming number are found in Australia!

b-0960-az-13-03-06-20M, originally uploaded by Barbara J H


1) Fierce Snake or Inland Taipan (Oxyuranus microlepidotus ), Australia. The most toxic venom of any snake. Maximum yield recorded (for one bite) is 110mg. That would porbably be enough to kill over 100 people or 250,000 mice. With an LD50 of 0.01 mg/kg, it is about 10 times as venomous as a Mojave rattlesnake and 750 times as venomous as a common cobra. The Fierce Snake is native to the arid regions of central Australia, extending from the southeast part of the Northern Territory, and into west Queensland. The Fierce Snake can also be found north of Lake Eyre and to the west of the split of the Murray River, Darling River and Murrumbidgee River. Fierce Snakes are known to live in holes, and feed on small rodents such as mice and rats. Despite its name, Fierce Snakes are not known to be particularly aggressive, but docile. They will strike if provoked, however, injecting their incomparably toxic venom.No fatalities have been attributed to this species, and all known bites have been to people who keep them in captivity or actively seek them out in the wild.

Eastern Brown Snake, originally uploaded by wollombi.

2) Australian Brown Snake (Pseudonaja textilis ), Australia. One 1/14,000 of an ounce of this vemon is enough to kill a person. The Eastern Brown Snake (Pseudonaja textilis) – sometimes referred to as the Common Eastern Brown Snake is the world’s second most venomous land snake, native to Australia and may also be found on the peninsulas of Papua New Guinea and Indonesia. Eastern Brown Snakes are very fast moving and highly aggressive. When agitated, they will hold their necks high, appearing in a somewhat upright S-shape. The snake will occasionally chase an aggressor and strike at it repeatedly.

Blue Krait
3) Malayan or Blue Krait (Bungarus candidus ), Southeast Asia and Indonesia. 50% of the bites from this snake are fatal even with the use of antivenin treatment.

Kraits are ophiophagous, preying primarily upon other snakes (including venomous varieties) and are cannibalistic, feeding on other kraits. They will also eat small lizards.

All kraits are nocturnal. The snake is more docile during the daylight hours, becoming more aggressive during the night. However, they are rather timid and will often hide their heads within their coiled bodies for protection. When in this posture, they will sometimes whip their tail around as a type of distraction.

Deadly Taipan Snake-04+, originally uploaded by cindytoo.
4) Taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus ), Australia. The venom delivered in a single Taipan bite is enough to kill up to 12,000 guinea pigs. The common taipan is the third-most venomous snake on Earth and arguably the second-largest venomous snake in Australia (the first arguably being the mulga, or king brown, snake, Pseudechis australis). The danger posed by the coastal taipan was brought to Australian public awareness in 1950, when young herpetologist Kevin Budden was fatally bitten in capturing the first specimen available for antivenom research.

Tiger Snake, originally uploaded by Xenedis.
5) Tiger Snake (Notechis scutatus ), Australia.

All Notechis species have a very potent neurotoxic venom, which may cause neurotoxic, hemolytic, coagulopathic, and myolytic reactions; paralysis or death can ensue in as short as 30 minutes, but if it occurs it is usually on the timespan of 6-24 hours after the bite. Notechis has historically been a significant contributor to snakebite envenomation in Australia. Prior to the development of specific antivenom, Tiger Snake bite fatalities probably approached 60-70% in cases of severe bites. Specific antivenoms are available for the treatment of tiger snake bites. Fortunately the snake will generally flee if intruded upon, but will become aggressive if cornered.

Beaked Sea Snake
6) Beaked Sea Snake
(Enhydrina schistosa )

This is a species of sea snake.It is found in the Arabian Sea and Persian Gulf (off Oman), south of the Seychelles and Madagascar, the seas off South Asia (Pakistan, India and Bangladesh), Southeast Asia (Myanmar (formerly Burma), Thailand, Vietnam), and Australia (Northern Territory and Queensland) and New Guinea.

Found in mangrove swamps.

Echis carinatus, originally uploaded by Drew Gardner.
7) Saw Scaled Viper (Echis carinatus ), Middle East Asia.

Echis carinatus is a venomous viper species found in parts of the Middle East and Central Asia, and especially the Indian subcontinent. It is the smallest of the Big Four dangerous snakes of India. Five subspecies are currently recognized, including the typical form described here.

This species is mostly crepuscular and nocturnal, although there have been reports of activity during daylight hours. [2] During they daytime they hide in all kinds of places, such as deep mammal burrows, rock fissures an fallen rotted logs. In sandy environments, they may bury themselves leaving only the head exposed. Often, they are most active after rains or on humid nights.

When alarmed, they put on a distinctive threat display.

They move about mainly sidewinding: a method at which they are considerably proficient and alarmingly quick. They are also capable of other forms of locomotion, but sidewinding seems to be best suited to moving about in their usual sandy habitats. It may also keep them from overheating too quickly, as they leave only two points of contact with the hot surface.

This species is often found climbing in bushes and shrubs, sometimes as much as 2 m above the ground. When it rains, up to 80% of the adult population will climb into bushes and trees. Once, it was observed how some 20 individuals had massed on top of a single cactus or small shrub.

Texas Coral Snake4, originally uploaded by The Horned Jack Lizard.
8 ) Coral Snake (Micrurus fulvius ), North America.

The coral snakes are a large group of elapid snakes that can be divided into two distinct groups, New World coral snakes and Old World coral snakes. There are three genera among New World coral snakes that consist of over 65 recognized species.

Coral snakes vary widely in their behavior, but most are very secretive, fossorial snakes which spend the vast majority of their time buried in the ground or in leaf litter of a rainforest floor, only coming to the surface during rains or during breeding season. Some species, like Micrurus surinamensis are almost entirely aquatic and spend most of their lives in slow moving bodies of water that have dense vegetation.

Like all elapid snakes, coral snakes use a pair of small fangs, which are fixed in the front of their top jaw, to deliver their venom. Due to the time it takes for the venom take effect, coral snakes have a tendency to hold on to a victim when biting, unlike vipers which have retractable fangs and tend to prefer to strike and let go immediately. Coral snakes are not aggressive or prone to biting however, and account for less than a single percent of the number of snake bites each year in the United States. Most coral snake bites occur because of accidental handling of the snake while engaged in an activity like gardening.

Due to the small size of coral snakes, along with their having much smaller fangs than pit vipers, bites are frequently ineffective and have some difficulty penetrating shoes or even thick clothing. This along with the fact that coral snakes are quite shy and reclusive makes bites quite rare. However, coral snakes are highly venomous, being the only relative of the cobra found in the New World. Despite their relatively small size, their venom is a powerful neurotoxin, quite capable of killing an adult human. Any bite from a coral snake should be considered life threatening and immediate treatment should be sought. Often there is very little reaction around the bite area, as opposed to the pain and swelling usually associated with a viper bite, and systemic effects can delay manifestation for 8-24 hours. This potential delay in symptoms makes treating coral snake bites particularly tricky, and often results in preventative treatment whether one is displaying symptoms or not. Once the neurotoxin takes effect, it causes the neurotransmitters between the brain and muscles to malfunction. Initially symptoms are slurred speech, double vision, difficulty swallowing, but can quickly progress to muscular paralysis, and even respiratory or cardiac failure if not treated.

Boomslang, originally uploaded by wapstar.
9) Boomslang (Dispholidus typus ), Africa.

A boomslang, Dispholidus typus is a large, venomous colubrid snake native to sub-Saharan Africa. It is the only species in its genus. Its name means “tree snake” in Afrikaans and Dutch.Boomslangs are largely arboreal, are very fast moving, and are oviparous. Their diet includes chameleons and other arboreal lizards, frogs, and occasionally small mammals, birds and eggs from nesting birds, which they swallow whole.

Most members of the colubrid family are harmless, or have relatively weak venom, but the boomslang is an exception. It has a highly potent venom which it delivers through large, deeply grooved fangs that are (like in most other venomous colubrids) located in the rear of the jaw. This type of venomous apparatus is called opisthoglypha. The boomslang is the most dangerous of the snakes with this method of venom delivery, due to its relatively large fangs and its relatively anterior position of the fangs compared to other opisthoglyphic taxa. The bite of the boomslang can be fatal, and has been reported to be not unlike bites from vipers. In 1957, well known herpetologist, Karl Schmidt died after being bitten by a boomslang. D.S. Chapman states that between 1919 and 1962 there were eight serious human envenomations by boomslangs, two of which were fatal. The South African Vaccine Producers (formerly South African Institute of Medical Research) manufactures a monovalent antivenom for boomslang venom. The venom of the boomslang is primarily a hemotoxin. This means that the venom attacks and destroys the hemoglobin in the red blood cells, destroying the blood in its victim. The venom of a boomslang disables blood clotting process and the victim often dies out of numerous internal and external bleedings. Other symptoms include: headache, nausea, sleepiness and mental disorders. Being a relatively slow-acting venom, the symptoms may occur many hours after the bite. On one hand, this provides time for arranging the serum, while on the other hand it may lead victims to underestimate the bite (especially when, as with other snakes, not every bite injects venom).

An adult snake has 4-8 mg of venom. 5 mg is said to be enough to kill a man.

The boomslang is a timid snake, and bites generally occur only while attempting to handle, catch or kill the snake.

death adder – acanthophis antarcticus, originally uploaded by fraser baz.
10) Death Adder (Acanthopis antarcticus ), Australia and New Guinea.

Death adders are very viper-like in appearance, having triangular shaped heads and small subocular scales. They also have vertical pupils and many small scales on the top of the head. Like vipers, they have short, fat bodies (normally 50 – 90 cm (20 – 36 inches) long). Their fangs are also longer and more mobile than for most other elapids, although still far from the size seen in some of the true vipers. Despite their name and appearance, they are not vipers at all, but elapids (like all Australian venomous snakes). This is a case of convergent evolution.

It normally takes 2 – 3 years to reach adult size. Females are generally slightly larger than the males. They can also be easily distinguished from other Australian snakes because of a short spine protruding from their tails. Most have large bands around their bodies, though the color itself is variable. Colors are usually grey or red, but also include brown, greenish-grey, or yellow.

Death adders inject on average 40 – 100 mg of extremely toxic venom (0.4 – 0.5 mg/kg murine LD50, subcutaneous) with a bite. This makes an untreated death adder bite one of the most dangerous in the world (rated in top 10 in the CSL list).

Death adder venom is highly neurotoxic. It blocks the post-synaptic neuromuscular transmission from the acetylcholine receptor. Unlike other snakes of its type, it does not contain either procoagulants or myolysins, making treatment easier.

A bite from a death adder causes paralysis. While this paralysis is very minor at first, it can cause death from a complete respiratory shutdown in as little as six hours. Symptoms peak in 24 – 48 hours.

Symptoms of envenomation can be reversed through the use of death adder antivenom, or using anticholinesterases, which break the synaptic blockade by making acetylcholine more available to the brain.

Before antivenom was introduced, 50% of death adder bites were fatal. Now, with the antivenom, and due to the slow progression of envenomation symptoms, fatalities from death adder bites are very rare in Australia. In New Guinea, deaths from these snakes are still common.

Categories: Earth · Inspiration · Posts with Photos · Snakes · Wildlife Photos

294 responses so far ↓

  • SHAHKAAR // November 8, 2006 at 12:15 am | Reply

    superb researches by the experts im really stunned

  • Ronald Burns // November 20, 2006 at 12:14 pm | Reply

    Very educational, my thanks to all involved in the research. Thanks to all who worked to make this information available.

  • priyanka // December 2, 2006 at 6:29 am | Reply

    awesome..

  • priyanka // December 2, 2006 at 6:30 am | Reply

    awesome

  • Lindsey V // December 21, 2006 at 10:01 am | Reply

    I simply love snakes! True, they’re not my very favorite animal, but I still pick them up like Steve did. Living in Iowa, I usually see only Garter snakes and bullsnakes, but boy can they be fiesty!! Like Steve Irwin knew, I know that most snakes are only deffencive until they figure out you mean them no harm, then they’re as gentle as a kitten. I found a wild Garter snake once. It continuosly struck at me, but luckily it wasn’t very long. I had that fiesty little snake “tamed” within ten minutes. That made me feel really good because I’ve always been a HUGE fan of Steve’s, and was very sad on Sep.4 when he died. I’ll miss you, mate!!!!!!!!!

  • Indian Snake Man « Loaded Monkeys // December 22, 2006 at 9:42 am | Reply

    [...] Check out these deadly snakes. [...]

  • bobby kogler // December 24, 2006 at 12:36 pm | Reply

    why would the title include the description “alarming”,aussies be proud of your magnificent herps,you have some of the most beautiful reptiles in the world!!!!herps rule!!!!

  • Hazel Knowles // December 28, 2006 at 9:01 pm | Reply

    Gosh I am surprised that the black mamba is not listed as one of the 10 deadliest. I knew the the boomslang was very dangerous but growing up in South African I always thought the Mamba was deadlier. Interesting reading. This is definately a site for the favourites list.

  • Sabrina S // January 15, 2007 at 4:18 am | Reply

    i abosolutely love snakes……i love learning as much as i can about them….especially when i was learning from steve….this site was pretty intersting…it actually taught me something i didnt know

  • Robert Price // February 9, 2007 at 3:29 am | Reply

    How did the Black Mamba miss the top ten? every other person that I have brought this subject to ,said that the Black Mamba is number one.The reasons were it’s tremendous speed and the fact that it is territorial, It will protect it,s turf.When other snakes run and hide, this one will come after you.It is very aggressive compared to any other snake.

    • JIMBOB // November 9, 2009 at 6:31 pm | Reply

      All snakes are VERY aggresive when cornered Robert. Here in Australia, we have 9 out of the top ten deadliest snakes in the world, or 22 out of the top 25, & all our snakes WILL chase you, and have 10 times the venom strength of the black mamba….basically an Aussie snake would eat it for breakfast.

  • D. Shevlin // February 11, 2007 at 8:33 am | Reply

    Uhmm…the absence of the Black Mamba from this list makes the information here highly suspect. Every other list i’ve seen includes the Mamba as no lower than the 5th most venomous/deadliest snake in the world.

  • secret master // February 20, 2007 at 6:43 am | Reply

    black mamba easily how do you people leave him out of the top 10 non the less number 1

  • Ram Gopalkrishnan // March 2, 2007 at 9:51 pm | Reply

    Very Informative,but can cover more snakes like Cobra,King Cobra,Mamba etc…

  • Albinus Creado // March 7, 2007 at 7:20 pm | Reply

    Very good knowledge sharing..

  • Ashish Pinjan // March 16, 2007 at 6:54 pm | Reply

    it is very informative but try to give information about the mambas,rattle snakes,cobras and the boa snake

  • mcgrazer // March 24, 2007 at 5:52 pm | Reply

    this is class, well done

  • zach // March 26, 2007 at 1:35 am | Reply

    hissssss…….very informative.certainly missed the black mamba and the bushmaster on the list which happens to be two of my favourite venomous snakes.along with its high level of toxicity, the mamba is also armed with a fast strike speed and swift movement which i feel poses a greater threat than any other land snake.quite amazing to know that australia is the home to many venomous creatures including snakes.i m sure australia is the perfect place when it comes to conducting researches on venomous creatures.i wish there were more discoveries other than the big four in india.i m certainly looking forward to hearing from any of u die hard snake fans out there.

  • mosaik // March 30, 2007 at 11:02 am | Reply

    Hey, I’m a mosaicist not a herpetologist! So blame someone else for the ranking of the snakes – I just looked up the info after I got an initial list. But I did look at several lists and the black mamba wasn’t on any of them…

  • tommy // March 31, 2007 at 8:47 am | Reply

    i lov the snakes of all over australia and i think steve was a great man.

  • tommy // March 31, 2007 at 8:48 am | Reply

    i am a real big fan of steve irwin

  • tommy // March 31, 2007 at 8:50 am | Reply

    I once had to guess the most deadliest snake in the world i said the taipan and got a free t-shirt.

  • cameron mckay // April 12, 2007 at 5:38 am | Reply

    cool

  • jcbiggar1 // April 20, 2007 at 8:46 am | Reply

    This is a great site. I am a snake lover and even created a snake site
    called SensationalSerpents.

  • Barry Nelson // April 21, 2007 at 1:09 am | Reply

    Nice page/info….i watched a program the other day about a snake catcher in oz he was called the snake man!!whoo lol…but on this program it said that the brown snake was the most venomous snake which i knew wasnt right so i emaild them saying that th info they used may not have correct they answered saying that i must have miss heard the program(which i didnt cos i had it taped) so emailed them back again with the quotes and all they answerd back saying i was write and what was meant to be said was that the brown snake is one of the most DANGEROUS snake in oz which is fair enough really!! but what do you guy feel…i agree btw thatnks for taking the time to read this if you do!!

  • Paul // April 24, 2007 at 1:26 am | Reply

    Although I am really scared of snakes, I try to learn as much about them as I can. Your picture of the Boomslang appears to be more like a Natal Spotted Bush snake… which is completely harmless… Please check the picture… search Google Images for “Spotted Bush Snake” to see.

  • j fellows // June 2, 2007 at 6:51 am | Reply

    This is a great site, it ’s good to see the good work still going on

  • graye // June 3, 2007 at 7:03 am | Reply

    the black mamba is the 4th most venomous snake in the world

  • matt miller // June 5, 2007 at 5:33 am | Reply

    no black mamba -100% mortality w/o antivenom(like the coastal taipan)
    no russell’s viper-kills more per square mile in the entire world
    no puff adder- Toxic and a hell of a strike
    are you kidding me??
    saw scaled no doubt – most fatalites in the world
    taipan, tiger – VERY Agressive and Very Toxic
    death adder/brown – deadly
    boomslang – very toxic but not aggresive
    did any one mention that the black mamba is the worlds fastet snake and with the coastal taipan capable of multiple facial strikes. Those two give me nightmares!!!
    Did anyone mention venom yield per bite?? A lot of venous snake bites do nor result in significant envemomation.

  • Tim // June 21, 2007 at 2:15 am | Reply

    I am a big fan of steve Irwin, too. He contributed so much o the world. He was a GREAT man.

    I am also like the biggest fan of snakes and i have one.

  • Florin // June 23, 2007 at 4:13 am | Reply

    Isn’t black mamba the deadliest snake on earth?

  • Dhirendra narayan mishra // June 25, 2007 at 2:41 am | Reply

    hello,
    It is very nice i come to know more about these poisionous snakes .ur collection is awsome.

  • steve crichton // June 26, 2007 at 5:32 pm | Reply

    Some fascinating information. However its a pity the Black Mamba was missed. The first two lists I came upon on the net listed the Mamba in the top 10 . Also the Russells Pit Viper, Bushmaster and the Fer de lance have a decent reputation in the countries they inhabit.

  • viven pather // June 28, 2007 at 11:46 pm | Reply

    i grew up in kwa zulu natal on sa .Once saw a black mamba that was so large that its body spread right across a two lane road.let me tell you it was an awesome sight.the inland taipan is certainly known to be the deadliest land snake due to its venom but the belchers sea snake has a venom far more toxic ,and is considered to be the most toxis snake on the planet .

  • arnab // June 29, 2007 at 12:03 am | Reply

    quite informative but pls include some more infm abt other poisonous snakes like banded krait , pit vipers, king cobras & sea snakes

  • Mark Aspray // July 2, 2007 at 8:32 am | Reply

    The best ever human to be involved in the nature ov animals,reptiles & every living creature will be looking down on everyone else to make sure all his hard work was not in vane.
    R.I.P Steve Irwin.

  • Juan Carlos Paz Fernández // July 21, 2007 at 3:32 am | Reply

    in this list no appear other species very dangerous and venomous like a venezuelan mountain coral snake (micrurus mipartitus), the monaguense rattlesnake (crotalus vegrandis) the biggest rattlesnake in the world the cuaima piña or bushmaster (lachesis muta), the black mamba (dendroaspis polylepis) and many others (many sea snakes very very venomous), ths jararaca (bothrops jararaca) and butterfly tiger (bothrops venezuelensis) please review this species

  • Ryan Eastman // July 31, 2007 at 12:52 am | Reply

    Im sorry but i am an ultimate snake fan,seeing as their my favorite animals, and i couldnt help but notice that you havent mentioned some snakes which r without doubt in the top 10 most deadly, like the Black Mamba, of course for being the fastest snake (12-14 mph) in the world and the 2nd most longest in the world and also possessing a very potent, very deadly venom consisting of neurotoxins andcardiotoxins, not to mention it is very widespread in a human inhabited area where i think there is no medical facilities. Others are the cottonmouth, gaboon and russels viper. Nevertheless your info about the mentioned snakes is pretty accurate and can influence other people how awesome these creatures are.

  • Manoj // August 2, 2007 at 1:48 am | Reply

    Its great!

  • Burger Loots // August 6, 2007 at 6:49 am | Reply

    Very nice pics!!!! However the pic of the Boomslang is incorrect.The one faetured is a harmless Spotted Bush snake (Philothamnus semivariegatus). Check out Snakes.co.za.
    Burger Loots
    South Africa

  • B.Loots // August 6, 2007 at 6:57 am | Reply

    The Black mamba is not as Fierce as folklore predicts.Graetly misunderstood is more true.
    Burger Loots
    Snakes.co.za

  • kirsten+kasey christensen // August 7, 2007 at 4:07 am | Reply

    this is the best snake website we have ever seen!thank you sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much for sharing this really interesting information with us! ever since i have been able to watch tv i have wanted to become like steve irwin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i hope that bindi and terri and little steve can make it out okay and i hope you continue the wonderful things you have done for animals and conservation of all animals across the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and again,THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Andries // August 10, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Reply

    what about the black mamba, green mamba, egipt cobra, pov adder. I have seen them all and are extreamly piosines snakes . I live in south-africa on an buch farm

  • Knowledge Absorber // August 15, 2007 at 12:31 pm | Reply

    This is a very interesting collection of snakes i am very young and love to learn about snakes and other reptiles and i read about all the snakes and all the comments and i think people agree with me that you have a nice collection

    • dz- s- punk // November 19, 2009 at 8:09 pm | Reply

      i love this site its like my friend i love snakes and love to learn about them but
      i cant find any good information but when i hit this site i was happy annd i got to pick
      up heeps of good infomation on my favourite snake THE INLAND TAIPAN!!!!!!!!! THANKYOU to who ever created this site you are so dam awsome!!!!!!!!!

  • Dersan // September 3, 2007 at 11:37 pm | Reply

    The contents are very informative. Datas about other deadly snakes all over the world can be included.The pictures included are also of very good clarity which is awesome.

  • aussie_keeper // September 10, 2007 at 7:56 pm | Reply

    hang on hang on hang on! i have never heard anyone dissagree to inland taipan as number one? it can kill 100 full grown men with the ammount of venom delivered in an averaged out bite dose. many times more then any other snake including ur precious black mamba. Is anyone familiar with LD50? (50% lethal dose) which is the ammonut of venom needed to kill 50% of the animals into which it is injected. Inland taipan av number of mice LD50 doses per bite = 218 000 coastal taipan= 95000 common cobra = 17000 tiger snake= 15000 common death adder =12000 king cobra= 11000 king brown =5000 eastern diamondback rattlesnake = 2700 common brown= 4000 copperhead= 2500 common black snake= 700 this is not top 10 list but just a gauge for u to look at the difference. as for many of these sites people who supply, read, correct sites need to make sure they know the difference between most venomous (max venom yeild and toxicity added) , most toxic (most toxic per mg of venom) and most deadliest ( venom yeild + toxicity + possible contact with humans + snake temperament + mortality rate of previous bite victims) just my two cents but the fact you have created interest and disscusion about snakes is much appreciated and hopefully educates some people who wouldnt normally be interested.

  • chris // September 12, 2007 at 4:07 am | Reply

    absoloutly awsome i love the detail so commencing

  • pierce // September 13, 2007 at 11:34 am | Reply

    So awesome to see all of this curiosity about snakes!! It is absolutely paramount to have the most information available to the people sharing living space with these animals, and it’s promising to see you all take a step here. I would love a compilation of a few different lists of snakes: most toxic venom, most venom injected per bite, and most fatalities and WHY. Seems we could keep this discussion and interest rolling if there was more info for the readers. Keep reading and learning!

  • mishelle // September 19, 2007 at 9:31 am | Reply

    again i will repeat what was said by other posts what about the black/brown mamba is is one of them ost dealiest if not he most

  • AJ Shaw // September 30, 2007 at 11:16 am | Reply

    I agree with the ozzie keeper, excellent site and there is a standard criteria in which to base the snakes being ‘deadly’. Perhaps a little surprised about the non-inclusion of the Black Mamba, it is exceedingly fast.
    Snake fan from New Zealand
    peace

  • Rupert // October 4, 2007 at 12:16 am | Reply

    My question is to aussie_keeper and others. I have read many forums and did a research and understood that Inland Taipan is the most venomous snake in the world.But I would like to know the postion of the King Cobra and Black Mamba among the top list.Well according to me the King Cobra is “The Snake” in the world be it a poisonous snake or a Non.I want the Aussie keeper to throw some light on King Cobra as well.

    Thanks for your info in advance.

  • KREMO // October 8, 2007 at 7:50 am | Reply

    everybodys always talking about these toxic snakes and they do demand a hell of respect but with antivenom on hand wheres the fun. imagine a 25 foot green anaconda putting the big squeeze on ya ass you will soon forget about fangs and venom. but one thing we will all never forget is the way stevo put his life on the line time and time again so we all can have the knowledge we got from this great person. RIP STEVO WE ALL MISS YOU AND YOUR WILD LIFE MISSION.

  • Rupert // October 16, 2007 at 12:16 am | Reply

    Yes Kremo you are right we all love Steve and we miss him so much……..

  • Frank H. Robbins // October 17, 2007 at 3:31 am | Reply

    The biggest rattlesnake ever reported to myself was an twenty foot rattlesnake. And about fourteen inches around. This was told by my uncle and was seen in southcentral Montana. He reported to seen this rattlesnake eat an whole sheep; alive and at once.

  • Rupert // October 20, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Reply

    Comon Frank H.Robbins it cant be true,the largest Venemous snake in the world is King Cobra which is eighteen foot long. Your uncle might seen an Anaconda or a Python.

  • Razza // October 21, 2007 at 8:24 pm | Reply

    WOO!! GO STEVO

  • Tabb // October 27, 2007 at 4:06 am | Reply

    I think this website was very educational on the species and their habitats. I will definetly be back to look some more.

  • quwanda // November 1, 2007 at 1:48 am | Reply

    wow i never saw so many snakes that is poisnous in my whole life

  • geoff irwin // November 2, 2007 at 4:46 pm | Reply

    you did a great job for wild life ,here and overseas, pity didnt catch up with you since you left melbourne, when i last saw you , hope family well Bob,Joy,Mandy and their families too

  • SONALIKA // November 9, 2007 at 3:01 am | Reply

    when i have started watching nat geo, discovery and animal planate ……..i have became more lover of mainly snakes and nature

  • Shwetang modi // December 12, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Reply

    hiiiiiiii this is great to been on this site & i got lots of information from this site i need some more info about world’ s top ten dedliest snakes in order of them attacking & venoum power wid photos n information

  • cameron mcdaniel // January 7, 2008 at 5:21 am | Reply

    spiders scare me more than snakes

  • M.SAI KIRAN // January 12, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Reply

    It was a very brief and Useful Information provided for us .Thank q very much

  • Loaded Monkeys // January 23, 2008 at 7:51 am | Reply

    Indian Snake Man

    Manoharan, known as Snake Manu puts a snake through his nostrils.
    He’s using two brown tree snakes from Chenai.
    Check out these deadly snakes.
    Rosie O’Donnell said the Donald was a snake oil salesman.

  • yoga pratama // January 25, 2008 at 3:12 am | Reply

    snakes are very dangerous animals……..thx

  • Brian // January 25, 2008 at 7:36 pm | Reply

    in the comments section i saw alot of comments about the black mamba, it is one of the deadliest snakes in the world but not in the top 10 for deadliest, if you bring up a list of the most dangerous snakes the black mamba will be in there for sure, with the deadliest snake list they are all more unexpected to when they will bite where as the most dangerous list is deadly snakes which will bite at any given oportunity.
    and the list of the worlds deadliest snakes above is accurate but i havnt done much research on number 3 though

  • Kona.Anuroopsai // February 7, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Reply

    I like snakes lot.so i want to know about snakes and save them.if you help me.so pls send me more.by
    K.Anuroopsai,
    Guntur (dist),
    andhrapradesh,
    INDIA.

  • ashton // February 17, 2008 at 6:48 am | Reply

    i am a teromoudus snake fan poisonous or not i love them and grue up around them

  • Keith // February 25, 2008 at 7:14 am | Reply

    Nice collection of venomous snakes as far as I know this list is pretty accurate in terms of LD50 factor which measures the amount venom needed to kill a mouse a common myth that it reflects the same toxicity to humans – consider the Sydney funnel web one of the deadliest speices of spider to man but no effect on mice, but it is the only indicator that we have at the moment since you cant really test it on humans.

    As for deadliest snake that would just be on how you measure it considering the number one on your list has no confirmed deaths attributed to it yet the saw scaled viper and russells viper kills thousands a year.

    Personally the dealiest snake is the fatally venomous snake which just bit me or in the case of the consitrictors the one whos squeeing the life out of me.

  • Alicia Gerken // February 27, 2008 at 5:36 am | Reply

    The Info. is amazing! I’ve learned way more than I did before! Steve Irwin was my hero. I’ve learned so much from watching his show my whole life (15 years). I will live out my dream and be just like my hero. Save animals and work hard to become a herpetologist. I am the biggest Steve Irwin fan you can find in Iowa!!! I am also the biggest snake fan you can find in Iowa!!!

  • Mecolo Lengunie // March 12, 2008 at 5:19 am | Reply

    EWE that is so grose!!!!! I usually hate snakes but these kind are really cool

  • Phill MacKracken // March 12, 2008 at 11:50 am | Reply

    No mention of the “Trouser Snake” here. I actually own a trouser snake and it has bit the Mrs. a few times. I dont know how venomous they are but the mrs ain’t scared to hold it

  • robin hood // March 13, 2008 at 5:33 am | Reply

    Do snakes attack even if you are not attacking it?

  • HARPREET // March 13, 2008 at 8:45 pm | Reply

    I trully love snakes . They are the amazing creatures in the whole world for me.
    I love them because they are really dangerous and I love dangerous things.

  • Amber // March 15, 2008 at 8:06 pm | Reply

    Great!!Lots of reasearch for my HW thanks god!

  • John Vinodh // March 19, 2008 at 8:54 pm | Reply

    Steve gave me a snake dictionary. Fantastic work by the crocodile hunter.

  • Pablo // March 29, 2008 at 5:56 am | Reply

    No Black Mamba?

  • samantha gayle browning // March 30, 2008 at 7:26 am | Reply

    these snakes look pretty scary but there so pretty this is samantha gayle browning

  • SOWMYA // April 21, 2008 at 1:58 am | Reply

    The great crocodile hunter has given us all such a valuable information regarding snakes. The exemplary legend has now left us all alone in this world. But his marvellous and adventurous deeds will remain in the history of the world forever.

  • Hmm // May 4, 2008 at 5:35 pm | Reply

    Perhaps the list is the most venomous, not the deadliest. That would possibly explain why the Mamba isn’t on here.

  • tyler // May 6, 2008 at 11:04 pm | Reply

    really freakin awsome i have watched steve’s shows ever since they have come on and i have become so snake savy that i plan to be a herpetologist just because of steve and wat i have learned by watching his show i was so devistaed on sept-4- 2006 that i actually got a tattoo of a crocodile head with a tear on my shoulder with 1996-2006 below it

  • derrick // May 12, 2008 at 4:58 pm | Reply

    what is truly the most venoumes snake with in the whole world… and also what is the bigest snake rec… and also why can gaters sht down there hearts and live with in froven pounds for… what makes them so spec to be abel to do that.. and also has any oen ever found out why the great white shark is not able to live with in captivy yet.. and how can the bull sharl go from fresh water to salt water… and also what makes the great white so spec to abel abel to go to such cold water like it does… meaning far as the artic ocean to get food…

  • joshua // May 17, 2008 at 9:40 am | Reply

    black mambas everyone ive talked are the deadliest snake in the world and the fact that the king cobra does let go of its bite until 9 teaspoons of venom is in you and its enough to kill 20 humans or an elephant in minutes its amazing there not on the top 10 let alone top 3

  • daffy // May 18, 2008 at 12:22 am | Reply

    Steve Irwin taught me a lot about snakes.I love snake now. Steve was my hero because he show us aussie the real Australia wildlife n im PROUND TO BE AN AUSSIE THANKS STEVE UR TRUE BLUE AUSSIE MATE

  • charles smith // May 26, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Reply

    everyone who has watched snake docos by experts knows the INLAND TAIPAN of AUSTRALIA is the worlds most venomous snake.But this does not make it the worlds most deadliest snake this should go to the snakes which cause the most deaths deaths per population.I think that leaves the black mamba and the russells viper as the two most DEADLIEST snakes in the world.good informative site and list.steve was a great australian and may he rest in peace

  • Katie // June 1, 2008 at 10:50 am | Reply

    That you have to watch out and you seem to know alot about snakes. Bye, Bye!!!!

  • RON // June 3, 2008 at 5:34 am | Reply

    Steve was Unreal person ….
    i really love the way he catches snaks nd Crocs…

    well thr r still few More Deadliest Snakes which r 2 b discovered …. i wish he would have got tht 2 …

    like the Coral nd Few more Sea Snakes …

    thr is a green Creeper snake in INDIA which neeeds 2 get attention ……

  • Joe // June 5, 2008 at 10:09 am | Reply

    Well obviously the black mamba may fit in as a Deadlier snake because it is more Aggressive, However! its venom is not nearly as lethal when compare to the others that actually made the list, the list is more focused on the capable killing power in the venom than the actual Kills accumulated by the snake itself.

  • Deepa // June 6, 2008 at 7:49 pm | Reply

    I get to know about some of the dangerous snakes in the world. Its really amazing to me.

  • potta // June 14, 2008 at 2:05 am | Reply

    some of u should read what the list is about.VENOMOUS snakes!the black mamba isnt one of the most venomous in the WORLD.But probably num 1 in africa.

  • sweety // June 16, 2008 at 5:04 pm | Reply

    i love the pohotos of the snake it is really beautiful.

    • deepak // January 16, 2010 at 9:09 pm | Reply

      in my childhood i think that snakes are deadly things and everyone should kill them,but now i think that they should alive to make the Earth more beautiful and God has given rights to live them.So don’t kill them.

  • sweety // June 16, 2008 at 5:05 pm | Reply

    woooooooo the snakes do look firece and they are really poisonous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Paul // June 17, 2008 at 3:27 pm | Reply

    Unfortunately, this is a terrible list.

    Deadliest must refer to a one on one encounter in close proximity to a snake that would tempt it to bite, for example, stepping on or too close to it. Now, the list changes considerably.

    The Inland Taipan is NOT an aggressive snake. In addition, it has small fangs, making envenomation much more difficult. Furthermore, even if it succeeds in biting, it’s small venom glands do NOT make it as potentially lethal as others.

    The coral snake has NO place on a list of the most deadly. Puny mouth, puny fangs, tiny venom glands.

    The krait, seasnake, and boomslang are extremely toxic, yet all are very shy and unlikely to bite unless grabbed or stepped on. Their being on this list is also silly.

    If you talk to people who could answer this best, those who milk snake venom for a living, or those who capture snakes for research purposes, the common taipan of Australia closely contends with the black mamba as the deadliest snake. They both have all the necessary qualities that most of this list fails at, they can close the distance between a percieved threat fast, unlike the vipers on this list, they have very lethal venom, large venom glands, fast and accurate strikes, and finally, LONG fangs to deliver the venom.

  • kalidass // June 21, 2008 at 2:09 am | Reply

    Great..

  • Ally // June 24, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Reply

    This information is terrific, but I have always seen the black mamba as the deadliest snake in the world. It does not have the most potent venom, but, from my understanding, it’s aggression, speed, size, and it’s highly toxic venom make it the deadliest. It is also found where most people in africa are. It hides in the bushes where crops are grown. It can also be found in the trees.

  • Mac // June 30, 2008 at 12:27 am | Reply

    First of all, everyone confuses a potent LD50 venom with making a snake ‘the deadliest’. That makes it the ‘most venomous’ but the two are not remotely interchangeable. ‘Deadliest’ is a combination of factors, including LD50, aggressiveness, speed, ability to accurately strike, etc. A small, slow, timid snake that avoids confrontation with a higher LD50 is LESS ‘Deadly’ than a more aggressive snake with a lower LD50. Using LD50 as the criteria for ‘deadliest’ is like saying that when comparing two armed men, the one with the BIGGER gun is the ‘deadlier’….despite the fact that the guy with the bigger gun may be so reluctant to fire as to not have a gun.

  • Paul // June 30, 2008 at 8:00 am | Reply

    Mike has a point, large constrictors can technically kill you MUCH faster than any venomous snake in the world. If a 20 foot python grabs you, you’re going to suffocate way quicker than even a full shot of Taipan or Mamba venom could do you in. Not to mention, if a large constrictor grabs you, you’re not getting a chance to go to the hospital..

  • Jonathan // July 1, 2008 at 7:06 pm | Reply

    I found this list informative, though there are a few snakes that I thought would be 1, 2 and 3…

  • Jimmy // July 1, 2008 at 7:11 pm | Reply

    this list gave me a lot of stuff for my HW!! Thanks

  • samantha // July 6, 2008 at 9:26 pm | Reply

    well the black mamba might be agrresive and all butyou might be interested to know that the venom is not as deadly as the snakes that are listed on here also with the anti-venom that is now in play makes it less deadly…. but i would like to know the name of the snake that a friend had called the three step snake can someone pls tell me

  • samtank // July 11, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Reply

    MAC you took the words right outta my mouth

  • jacques // July 13, 2008 at 3:48 am | Reply

    samtank and Mac might be correct, but the fierce snake is still the one I would not want to step on.

  • Nate // July 14, 2008 at 11:37 am | Reply

    I am surprised that the author did not give the LD50 for each snake and then rank order them based on this data.

  • judy ann // July 15, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Reply

    i am very scared of snakes i find this very informative i have nightmares especially when i watch snakes on the plane i have only seen a snake once it was a baby but i know that in paradise they are no other wild animals will harm us

  • Girosender // July 23, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Reply

    Love the site and stevie boy will be missed. But have to agree with alot of people about the Black Mamba, which should definately be on the list as this thing will bite you several times and inject more venom in one bite than any other other snake in its classed. Its very territorial, extremly aggressive, very fast, has height, and is widely common throughout Africa. But even so I love one as a gaurd dog, but it would probably be a short relationship ! Love the site….JK

  • ISHA // July 27, 2008 at 1:07 am | Reply

    cool man , niceli arranged and well built information u gave!!! i appreciate dat! keep it up!!

  • emmanuel // August 2, 2008 at 9:35 pm | Reply

    i love the pics and u all are doind a great job keep it up

  • Sreenivas // August 10, 2008 at 4:53 pm | Reply

    More than the above mentioned list, the debate it has led to in the blogs is impressing, especially with the interpretations given to the words “deadly,” “venomous,” “toxic.” I think Saw Scaled Viper, Black Mamba, Indian Cobra have killed more people than any other snake ! These can be listed as the most dangerous or deadliest snakes though they are not the most venomous snakes !

  • Lebo // August 19, 2008 at 3:03 am | Reply

    I stay at an area which is dominated by ppoisinous snakes incliding the black mamba. My worry when i looked on this site, is that people are very sceptical about this research of information. I mean they are quick to critisize and are slow to advise. My plea to better this vital information is that those who have more knowledge must stop critisising this site, instead they must help get more information to poeple like my self. This information was helpful and can improve. Siyabonga!

    Makhado South Africa

  • Craig Apana // August 23, 2008 at 5:28 pm | Reply

    The Black Mamba in my mind is the #1 most “dangerous” snake in the world. But this list is the most “deadliest”. Black Mamba venom would rank in the top 15-20, not top 10. That’s why it isn’t on Steves list. Glorious!!!

  • mbama chibuzo // August 28, 2008 at 3:44 am | Reply

    i like the snakes and all but what i’m searching for is the big ones like the anacondas and the reticulus phyton

  • joshua // September 4, 2008 at 9:28 am | Reply

    CROCS RULE!!!!

  • Kerry J! // September 16, 2008 at 11:19 am | Reply

    The Black Mumba. It could also be called “The Nike Snake” (because it’s very athletic, fast and all.) Lol. It’s all good. :D Hey, Yall forgot “The Asian Cobra!”, Another bad muthafuckin’ snake that can kill you as well! My man Steve Irwin IS NEVER 4GOTTEN! He’s a legend! Thank you great one for informing us!, AND FOR JUST being there! :) My respects go to his family as well. And no Steve is not crazy, He’s just a wyld, kool guy! :D

  • kurt batchelor // September 30, 2008 at 10:50 pm | Reply

    i love snakes there is nothing more that interest me

  • amit das // October 7, 2008 at 9:25 pm | Reply

    great is thy collection but i wander wether king cobra is one of the deadliest,also i wud like you to ponder over rattle snakes

  • Aamir khan // October 10, 2008 at 7:48 am | Reply

    this list is incomplete. The world no doubt most dangerous snake BLACK MUMBA is missing. And King Cobra,russel viper,Fer de lance are missing

  • Aamir khan // October 10, 2008 at 7:52 am | Reply

    African Black Mumba is the most dangerous snake on the planet.

  • Håvard // October 19, 2008 at 4:54 am | Reply

    Blackmamba is one of the most poisonous snakes for sure, but this list is for the deadliest snakes.

  • Aamir Khan // October 20, 2008 at 7:22 am | Reply

    Ok! We can understand…but let’s say if you have to handle with them one by one, which will be most dangerous,nervous and deadliest for you. Try it!!! Others might let you go but Black Mumba might not!

  • gabriel // October 25, 2008 at 6:45 pm | Reply

    no way is the inland taipan the deadliest. the black mamba’s the world’s deadliest snake

  • Boobler // October 31, 2008 at 6:24 am | Reply

    I loved Steve Irwin sinse i was only 2 and saw ever show that he made. I also saw Bindi’s saw and she will be just like her dad. Also i thought that the black mamba was the world deadliest snake in the world, but it is the inland taipan.

  • jhown // November 3, 2008 at 12:06 pm | Reply

    …it is really a great website…
    ….Im not that fanatic to SNAKES but I think it is interesting to learn,,,In my whole life I didnt see big snakes but only those little creatures,,,,I hope I could also see deadly and poisonous snakes…to something unique…;>>>JHOWn<<<<

  • booboo // November 11, 2008 at 5:19 pm | Reply

    wow they were some scarey pics … Amazing!!
    how did you get so close??
    you are probably steve Irwins Side Kicks!!
    good luck for the future snap shotting!!
    dont get bitten
    !!
    Jody Hellis

  • tyler // November 13, 2008 at 12:15 am | Reply

    crap

  • Drew // November 16, 2008 at 4:13 am | Reply

    Hi,nice page.here’s black mamba info…enjoy. YouTube – Black Mamba vs. Animal Kingdom

  • Vincent // December 7, 2008 at 3:48 pm | Reply

    This list is based upon the most toxic venom for a given volume (the LD 50). The mamba venom is not as deadly but its bite is always fatal if untreated because of the volume that is injected and it certainly it is the most dangerous snake in the world.

  • sissi verdie de gavour // December 9, 2008 at 5:03 pm | Reply

    well, i was born in brazil shering a farmer with jararaca, cascavel, cobra coral, sucuri the would known as boa,cabesa de capanga,urutu, they all can send you to talk to st peter in a short time. i have a lot of respect for these reptiles and love them, i am on my way to arizona to build the first sanctuary for all those snake that people are killing to building new houses. you may think i am, crasy , i am sure you will joyn me.love sissi

  • ANGELIN DANIEL RAJ // December 11, 2008 at 9:40 pm | Reply

    i like this ,bcoz i can know them witout any harm. and my whole credit goes 2 my hero “STEEVE”.i am an indian,so i can’t know many kinds of snakes apart 4rom my place.this helps me alot….

  • Kay {Babieboo} ♥ // December 13, 2008 at 1:54 am | Reply

    This thing is a liar the so called #10 snake is #5!! if u r gunna show it show it right!!!! Dont listen 2 it!! LIARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Kay {Babieboo} ♥ // December 13, 2008 at 2:03 am | Reply

  • Mac // December 30, 2008 at 4:43 pm | Reply

    How in the hell does the coral snake make ‘The Deadliest Snakes in the World’ list and the Black Mamba get left off? The coral snake kills one person per century! I wish folks would get it right……a high LD50 doesn’t make you ‘The Deadliest’ just the most toxic venom. The Black Mamba may not be number 1 on the ‘Highest LD50′ list, but it’s number 1 on ‘The Deadliest Snakes in the World’ list. When confronted by an angry version of any of these species, the Black Mamba is the one most likely to ensure your name becomes a statistic, hands down!

  • Snake Lover! // December 31, 2008 at 9:19 am | Reply

    Enough with your Black mamba!
    yes its venomous but the taipans kick but!!! and secondly you people need to take into consideration of the LD50! that aussie_keeper knows what he’s talking about but you guys don’t know JACK!

  • samarth srivastava // January 5, 2009 at 12:15 am | Reply

    i like learning about snakes.

    this is a very good site

  • Jake // January 6, 2009 at 12:52 am | Reply

    I have a hard time believing that the Fer-de-lance is not included somewhere on this list (South America). I’m from Colombia, and this is definately the most feared snake in the western hemisphere. I knew of several people who died from it’s bite when I lived in the jungle, the person I actually knew pretty well only had 3 hours after he was struck. … anyone know how the Fer-de-lance measures up?

  • bitten // January 8, 2009 at 1:18 am | Reply

    it’s great information. up until nowi didn’t know the ring/blue krait is the 3rd venomous snake in the world. and im so damn lucky to be alive after i was bitten during an expedition back in sri lanka. i recognise the snake straigh away after i was bitten but didn’t had the courage the to kill it coz i love snakes so much.

    to give u an idea how much it hurts when the snake bites you, multyply the pain from an injection by 100’s, if u do bush walking and shit wear proper foot wear and jeans and stuff. never go in shorts. i was saved by my jeans coz i didn’t get the full bite. if i did well ooooppppsssss

    Long Live Ring Krait i love you…………

  • James // January 14, 2009 at 2:45 am | Reply

    From what I can tell, no two top ten list of deadliest venomous snakes are alike, but the absence of the Black Mamba is an oversight. If you didn’t see it on any of your deadliest list searches you didn’t do much research.

    Also the King Cobra is known for being capable of delivering by far the most venom that can compensate for its lack of venom deadliness compared to other deadly snakes.

    This list does have the nicest pictures I’ve seen.

  • James // January 14, 2009 at 3:02 am | Reply

    By the way, the title of the article is “The Deadliest Snakes in the World” and not “The Most Venomous Snakes in the World” or “The Most Fatally Venomous Snakes in the World”, so I think the criticisms leveled in many comments are warranted.

    There is no intro to the article that defines “deadliest”, but there should have been.

    A rifle may be deadlier than a dagger when you hit the right spot, but if I shoot you with a rifle in the foot and stab you in the neck with a dagger 20 times, you may choose the rifle shot.

  • Peter // January 17, 2009 at 12:09 am | Reply

    Its one of the best websites in the world

  • Fatso // January 20, 2009 at 7:21 pm | Reply

    Well i though the black mamba was more venomous than the boomslang, am shocked.

  • daza // January 21, 2009 at 10:32 pm | Reply

    Surely u have to include the black mamba??!

    Its speed and aggression mixed with neurotoxic venom has to make it the most feared snake in the world!!

  • ashen samaranayake // January 22, 2009 at 8:20 pm | Reply

    i want 2 knw hu is da most poisonous snake in da world

  • DanL // January 24, 2009 at 3:17 pm | Reply

    This list is poor in presentation, and contradictory.
    Writing about this #1, you assert an LD50 of 0.01 which is “ten times” that of Mojave rattler; later, you give an LD50 of 0.4 for the Death Adder: that’s FOURTY times less potent, so why is it included but not the Mojave rattler (of which there is a chilling account of near-death from a mere nip to an owner, on-line)?!

    You need to state the criteria for selection–is is potency per unit of venom (even it the snake lacks sufficient volume to kill–as is implied in the information for the Boomslang (5mg enough to kill, adults have 4-8mg)!?), or potency + volume per bite, hence lethality upon being bitten.
    Several sources claim that the lethality of untreated mamba & taipan bites is about 100%–one cannot be deader than dead.
    (To my surprise, the Bushmaster seems high-rated by this measure, too.)
    “between 1919 and 1962 there were eight serious human envenomations by boomslangs, two of which were fatal.” whoopee: that hardly sounds “most deadly”; and has the coral snake ever killed?!

    Other lists have taken the number of dead as key indicators, and I’ve seen the Saw-scaled viper tops, there. And, contrary one comment above, I thought that some krait racked up a big tally, also (in a country with many many & poor citizens–India).

    I’ve always heard the Fierce snake’s potency qualified as tops for a LAND snake, so am surprised that some sea snake isn’t higher for that.

    Do NOT Pass GO!

  • daza // January 24, 2009 at 7:04 pm | Reply

    Dan l u need to calm down!! This is not a university study or some theses on the subject;0

    General guidelines:)

    Black mamba is definitely missed tho!!!

  • RINI JACOB // January 25, 2009 at 11:27 pm | Reply

    I LOVE ANIMALS A LOT AND I WISH TO PROTECT & GUARD THEM & WANT TO BE WITH THEM.I WISH TO WORK WITH THE FAMILY OF STEVE.WHAT SHOULD I DO FOR THIS &WHAT IS ITS PROCEDURE?
    I AM TRULY DEDICATED.

  • soham // January 30, 2009 at 9:10 pm | Reply

    I AM A LOVER OF SNAKES.BUT I THINK THE PEOPLE ARE MISUNDERSTANDING THE SNAKES.AS I AM A MEMBER OF A GROUP WHO ARE INTERESTED IN SNAKES WE ALL MAKE MEASURES OF HELPING AND PROTECTING SNAKES AS THEY ARE THE MOST SUCCESSFUL IN THE RACE OF THE SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST

  • deadly australians,joost,taipan,inland taipan,fierce snake,snake,snakes,venomous snakes,australie,down under | Capwoc.com Muziekblog // January 31, 2009 at 11:37 am | Reply

    [...] de giftigste landslang ter wereld. En uiteraard komt dit monster alleen in Australië voor, net als negen van de tien giftigste slangen ter wereld! Waarom al die Europeanen zo graag naar het kleinste continent cum grootste eiland ter [...]

  • John L. Miller // February 4, 2009 at 4:25 am | Reply

    You should explain that there is a difference between a “dangerous” snake and a snake with highly toxic venom. The mambas (black & green) are perhaps more dangerous than some of the snakes with the deadliest venom because they can be very aggressive and are extremely quick.

  • John L. Miller // February 4, 2009 at 4:28 am | Reply

    While we’re at it, we could include Henry Kissinger on the list of the worst snakes in the world.

  • Nitin Raj // February 4, 2009 at 9:09 pm | Reply

    wat a collection of beautiful reptiles, today i read all about these snakes, nd i m thankful to all of u who have contributed their knowledge about these beautiful reptiles

  • gavin // February 7, 2009 at 9:59 pm | Reply

    why isn,t the bushmaster included,it is one of the most dangerous and deadliest snakes in south america.any way it,s good to know about the different types of venomous snakes around the world……

  • cassie // February 15, 2009 at 6:53 pm | Reply

    wow thats some cool facts! i cant believe the worlds deadliest snakes are in Australia!

  • Chakwana // February 19, 2009 at 7:17 pm | Reply

    Where are the Black Mamba and the Cobra on this list?

  • ANGELIN DANIEL RAJ // February 19, 2009 at 9:29 pm | Reply

    I DON’T NO Y U PEOPLES R FIGHTING 4 BLACK MAMBA? AS OUR HERO ‘ STEEVE’ WAS PASSED AWAY,WE MUST MUST CONGRADULATE HIS ADVENTVURES……… LET US ALL JOIN TOGETHER 2 START VOTING 4 MAMBA AND COBRA 2 TAKE PART IN THIS LIST.

  • dama silayio // February 24, 2009 at 6:13 pm | Reply

    being so green at much about snakes,this site definitely spokes curious fire about them.i just had to know more about snakes after seeing one that swam up through the drain into a toilet bowl

  • MattyDee // February 28, 2009 at 3:13 am | Reply

    List of Deadliest Snakes in the world as per their ranking : –
    1) Fierce Snake or Inland Taipan (Oxyuranus microlepidotus ), Australia. The most toxic venom of any snake. Maximum yield recorded (for one bite) is 110mg. That would porbably be enough to kill over 100 people or 250,000 mice. These rare snakes are vitually unknown in collections outside of Australia.
    2) Australian Brown Snake (Pseudonaja textilis ), Australia. One 1/14,000 of an ounce of this vemon is enough to kill a person.
    3) Malayan Krait (Bungarus candidus ), Southeast Asia and Indonesia. 50% of the bites from this snake are fatal even with the use of antivenin treatment.
    4) Taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus ), Australia. The venom delivered in a single Taipan bite is enough to kill up to 12,000 guinea pigs.
    5) Tiger Snake (Notechis scutatus ), Australia.
    6) Beaked Sea Snake (Enhydrina schistosa ), South Asian waters Arabian Sea to Coral Sea..
    7) Saw Scaled Viper (Echis carinatus ), Middle East Asia.
    8) Coral Snake (Micrurus fulvius ), North America.
    9) Boomslang (Dispholidus typus ), Africa.
    10) Death Adder (Acanthopis antarcticus ), Australia and New Guinea.
    11) Black Mamba, both species of Green Mambas, and the Mojave Rattlesnake.

  • MattyDee // February 28, 2009 at 3:17 am | Reply

    Black mamba lovers, you need to get over the fact that the Mamba is not as deadly as you think. while they kill kore people due to snake per people population density..it is not a ranking of how many people they kill but how deadly they are to all living creatures and their venom toxin..
    Also Mamba’s dont chase people, they are extremly fast and if you happen to be in line with one then you may think it is chasing you and it will bite you, but people kill more mamba’s and they avoid us as much as possible

  • MattyDee // February 28, 2009 at 3:18 am | Reply

    The most deadly snake, and the most dangerous snake are two entirely different concepts. Some of the snakes with the most toxic venom, i.e., the most deadly, rarely bite people.

  • MattyDee // February 28, 2009 at 3:19 am | Reply

    There are many factors that influence the seriousness of a bite.
    The factors include the individual’s health, size, age, and psychological state. The nature of the bite may also vary, like penetration of one or both fangs, amount of venom injected , location of the bite , and proximity to major blood vessels. The health of the snake and the interval since it last used its venom mechanism is also important. These multiple variables make every bite unique. Depending on circumstances, the bite of a “mildly” venomous snake may be life-threatening and that of a “strongly” venomous snake may not.

  • MattyDee // February 28, 2009 at 3:20 am | Reply

    sorry about the info overload….lol

  • MattyDee // February 28, 2009 at 3:21 am | Reply

    The Most Dangerous Snakes that kill the most people according to the geographical locations are as given below : –

    In the United States the coral snake has a very toxic venom but has killed few people because it is small, secretive and gentle. The most dangerous are the rattlesnakes like the Eastern and Western Diamondbacks. These rattlesnakes are large, have large venom glands, are relatively common, and are more likely to hold their ground and bite.

    In Africa common Egyptian Cobras, Saw-scaled Vipers, and Puff Adders would be the most dangerous.

    In Asia the common Cobra and the Russell’s Viper are the snakes that kill the most people.

    Although the Asian Cobra and Russell’s Viper probably kill most of the people who die of snake bite annually in the world neither of them are among the most Deadly Snakes.

  • MattyDee // February 28, 2009 at 3:22 am | Reply

    And still no Black Mamba

  • George P // March 5, 2009 at 10:35 am | Reply

    Live and learn. I have no wish to visit Australia after viewing this. Awesome though.

  • yoyoyo // March 8, 2009 at 3:26 am | Reply

    the black mamba is the deadliest

  • gaurab // March 8, 2009 at 6:49 am | Reply

    its really fascinating… i jus love to watch snakes….

  • kasia nguyen // March 10, 2009 at 10:13 am | Reply

    WOW that was so cool

  • nishchay // March 11, 2009 at 10:57 pm | Reply

    coral snake is very beautiful

  • X // March 13, 2009 at 5:25 pm | Reply

    Wrong Information in your pictures,
    That’s NOT Boomslang,

    it’s Philothamnus semivariegatus- Spotted Bush Snake

  • Shifali. // March 13, 2009 at 7:46 pm | Reply

    Fantastic! very intereting. The photos make my body benubed.

  • anish // March 21, 2009 at 8:23 pm | Reply

    excellent article!
    missed out king cobra,black mamba and the indian cobra!very pity!

  • hemant // March 23, 2009 at 11:47 pm | Reply

    suarly when i was watching these snakes i was in deadline or horrifying mode,it’s realy thrils me, but the ratle-snake….. i miss that one….

  • Gcobani // March 27, 2009 at 5:29 pm | Reply

    I love snake i wish i can see the worlds most biggest anaconda

  • Black Mamba Wins // March 31, 2009 at 6:55 am | Reply

    People, get your facts straight! Steve was awesome, but he didn’t know everything. The Black Mamba is the most deadly AND has the most toxic venom. I have worked with Venomous snakes all my life and from my studies, 100mg of Black Mamba venom can kill 250 people, 100mg of Inland Taipan venom can kill 170 humans, 100mg of Russell’s Viper venom can kill 150 humans, 100mg of Indian Krait venom can kill 60 humans, and 100mg of common forest cobra venom can kill 50 or less people. Mambas have longer fangs, more powerful venom and inject more then Inland Taipans. If you want more proof, check out the book of world records 2009. I did the research for the deadliest snake article. Mamba killing time is usually 10-40 minutes, but has been recorded at less than 5 minutes. Mambas are also the fastest and most agressive snakes. They travel up yo 13 mph and DO chase humans. They grow between 14 and 16 feet and strike at 5 meters per second. For those King Cobra enthusiasts, they can inject 500mg+ per bite and have killed elephants in under 3 hours. I hope this helps. Please respond, I will read them all and try to answer any questions or respond to messages. Please no irate messages, I won’t respond to those. Thanks

  • Fatso // March 31, 2009 at 5:01 pm | Reply

    Hey guys i dont know a thing about these Inland Taipans, the Russell’s Vipers or the Indian Kraits and i do respect them. Bt i knw the black mamba. That sepant is bad news at one time that snake bit two adult cows in a commotion near a water hole one of the cows died the same day, the other one was dead in the pan the following morning.

  • Black Mamba Wins // April 1, 2009 at 5:10 am | Reply

    Another thing about black mambas is that they are so long, when they stand fully erect, there heads may be 2 meters (6 1/2 feet) off the ground. They are one of only two snakes that can do that and have bitten humans in the face. The other is the King Cobra.

  • Eric Ojiah // April 4, 2009 at 11:43 am | Reply

    I love snakes, but I love mamba better.

  • jasmine // April 18, 2009 at 4:26 am | Reply

    i think that snakes are cool when i am not getting chased by them. that is really it

  • FRed // April 21, 2009 at 12:31 am | Reply

    This is really cool

  • jesse // April 24, 2009 at 11:26 pm | Reply

    people say i’m strange because i like snakes so much. but when they say that i ask them if they know what a black mamba is and of course they say no.

  • hubert // April 30, 2009 at 11:02 pm | Reply

    i like snakes….bcoz of their enthusias in sex…

  • shahid // May 8, 2009 at 4:42 am | Reply

    In India snakes are worshiped.They deserve to be worshiped.According to our VEDAS if you have any problem with snakes ,come to INDIA,come to me ,I will take you to the GOD of snakes and after that snake will never harm you.

  • Clever And Cool Team Names That Rock | Personal Development by Personal Development and Growth Blogger | Mystic Madness // May 9, 2009 at 7:07 pm | Reply

    [...] 5)    Boomslang- This is one of the Top ten deadliest snakes in the world with very high mortality rate. This snake is found in Africa and is very quick and venomous in its own class. While the list includes many inspiring name, Boomslang is natural choice because of ease with which it can be spelled out. You can find more at The Deadliest Snakes in the World. [...]

  • Hudson Lewin // May 16, 2009 at 12:54 am | Reply

    I’m a student and I have been taught that websites that have spelling errors in simple words should not be trusted. Learn how to spell probably. I agree that the Black Mamba should be on the list as well.

  • Black Mamba Wins // May 17, 2009 at 11:40 pm | Reply

    I agree with you Hudson Lewin, the Black Mamba should be on the list. But those of you who say the Boomslang, though it does have highly toxic venom, it barely injects any and is extremely reluctant to strike.

  • Black Mamba Wins // May 17, 2009 at 11:44 pm | Reply

    MattyDee needs to get over himself and learn a thing or two

  • hoolahonka // May 20, 2009 at 10:00 am | Reply

    black mamba is definitely in the top ten deadliest snakes. get ur facts right.

  • Bert // May 20, 2009 at 2:54 pm | Reply

    I had to live for 3 years in the Central America rain forest.As some of my companions, we had many encounters with different kind of nakes. One ime while sleeping shirtless, a green,slim and about 6-7 feet long snake fell from a tin roof on my chest, but as I jumped from my sack it did slip away. Another time while cutting our waythru the jungle a little (3 feet aprox)slim snake,with color bands in yellow,red,black bit the front guy in the face,the guy started bleeding out from every porous in his upper body,when bleeding stopped his skin
    turned dark and his body got stiff,he coiled his
    body like a baby whilie taken him to a Hospital.
    It took us all together around 4 hours to get him
    to the nearest Hospital. The guy survived the bite. It showed us to spect the unspected, not
    to understimate this dangers and to kill any snake in our way.

  • Apostolos Stingas // May 22, 2009 at 9:58 pm | Reply

    Excellent Article !!!!
    Go ahead !!

  • joe // May 23, 2009 at 6:48 am | Reply

    Love the reading. I have always loved snakes mean or gentle. They do such a great job cleaning up the rodents. They are so important and I have always respected and feared those that are meant to be . Like anything wild they are so unpredictable. I have been bitten before but I hold no hatred. Only god could have created such a Beautiful creature as they are mentioned so much in the bible for a scare tactic. The other reader stated “Kill any snake in our way”. So typical of ignorance.

  • Black Mamba Wins // May 25, 2009 at 4:26 am | Reply

    Based on my studies, I have made a list of the REAL top 10 most deadly snakes.
    1) Black Mamba
    2) Inland Taipan
    3) King Cobra
    4) Tiger Snake
    5) Boomslang
    6) Beaked Sea Snake
    7) Indian Krait
    8) Green Mamba
    9) Russell’s Viper
    10) Saw-Scaled Viper

  • Black Mamba Wins // May 25, 2009 at 4:31 am | Reply

    Let me make this clear one more time for any who still have doubts about what I am saying. The Black Mamba has the most potent venom of any snake (even the inland taipan and sea snakes), it injects more than most other snakes (including the inland taipan), and is the most aggressive snake. It is very willing to strike and DOES CHASE HUMANS. The inland Taipan is NOTHING compared to it.

  • nama saya zal // May 28, 2009 at 12:39 pm | Reply

    takut bgt dgn ular

  • jerry hartley // June 3, 2009 at 10:31 am | Reply

    what is the name of the snake that has a yellow stripe on either side of it’s body,thank you.This snake is around the Reading,Pa. area

  • levi // June 8, 2009 at 1:44 am | Reply

    those were some awsome snakes we like em

  • Indrajit // June 18, 2009 at 6:27 pm | Reply

    please add blackmamba , indian cobra,eziptian black kobra

  • Black Mamba Wins // June 21, 2009 at 7:35 am | Reply

    The mamba’s venom turns out to be more toxic than we initially thought. If the venom gets directly to a vein, the estimated LD50 is 0.25mg to kill an adult human. The Inland Taipan is quite deadly, but a human LD50 of 0.49mg requires more venom than the mamba’s human LD50 of 0.37mg. I find Bert and Hubert to be really immature and ignorant. To say you want to kill all snakes in your way is very low. I am glad Joe shares these same thoughts.

  • ju // June 21, 2009 at 10:23 am | Reply

    wow

  • 711 // June 21, 2009 at 10:25 am | Reply

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • DAZA // June 22, 2009 at 6:51 am | Reply

    Its about time the discussion gets silenced with the fact that the BLACK MAMBA is the most feared, most agressive and most revered snake for its speed and all round dangerous criteria…

    Tho there might be some slighly more toxic in terms of poison such as tiger sanke and boomslang, the Black Mamba is…the ultimate…of deadly snakes!!!

    FAST, AGRRESIVE, INCREDIBLE ACCURACY OF STRIKE, DEADLY NEUROTOXIC….

    ALL THE SOUTH AFRICAN PPL SAY…’WE TOLD U SO!!’ HAHAHA

  • Visitor in my garden created panic - Page 3 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum // June 22, 2009 at 5:54 pm | Reply

    [...] [...]

  • Sidharth // June 26, 2009 at 5:23 am | Reply

    i read some where that Hydrophis Belcheri is world’s most venomous snake even more venomous than inland taipan.

  • Sidharth // June 26, 2009 at 5:29 am | Reply

    Hydrophis Belcheri is more venomous than BLACK MAMBA

  • Sidharth // June 26, 2009 at 5:31 am | Reply

    no doubt that black mamba is most feared bcos its aggressive and can speed up to 18kmph…its world’s fastest snake…but the toxicity of Hydrophis Belcheri’s venom is more than any other snake in the world

  • Black Mamba Wins // June 26, 2009 at 7:49 am | Reply

    Sidharth, you are sooo wrong! There is not one snake on land or underwater or anywhere else in the world with a more toxic venom than the Black Mamba!

  • lady36 // June 30, 2009 at 1:11 am | Reply

    I truly think the brown snake should have been number one instead of number two. they are very deadly and aggresive. they don’t hide they will come after you from yards like and assaian or something..they can kill an elephant if they wanted to.

  • Sidharth // July 2, 2009 at 7:53 pm | Reply

    black mamba is the deadliest snake.no doubt.but it is not most venomous.

  • Black Mamba Wins // July 4, 2009 at 9:12 am | Reply

    Were you not listening Sidharth? The Black Mamba is the most deadly and most venomous. No snake has a more toxic venom. Not an Inland Taipan or any type of Sea Snake. 0.25mg of its venom is enough to kill 1 healthy adult human being. It can inject up to 400mg, making it capable of killing 1600 healthy adult human beings.

  • rose // July 5, 2009 at 9:08 am | Reply

    are there any deadley snakes that are red and black in southe carolina!!!!!!!!!! thanks… rose…

  • Tim // July 7, 2009 at 1:26 am | Reply

    People seem to have difficulty in realizing there is the inland taipan and its larger relative, the taipan. I think the writer who believes the black mamba is number 1 at everything, flies in the face of recognised experts world wise. The experts state the inland taipan is the world’s most venemous land snake. Its larger relaitive, the taipan [officially recognised as the 3rd longed venemos snake in the world], has the logest fangs of any elapid in the world [including the king cobra and the black mamba]! It is always placed higher on venemous snake listings that have been compiled by recognised snake professionals and academics, [usually about 3rd], and I have never seen the black mamba listed in the top 10 of any reputable listing anywhere in the world! The inland taipan is fairly friendly and often it is a chore to get it to strike! However its larger relative, the taipan will 100% of the time retreat at distance and avoid a confrontation. However, if you enter into what it considers ‘its zone’, it is 100% guaranteed to attack ferociously making loud hooping sounds at it attacks at full speed and throws its whole body against the victim, inflicing multiple strikes. This snake is all retreat at distance or all attack upon entering its zone [with no middle mentality]. Many people think the most dangerous snake in the world is that which kills the most people. But Australia is sparsely populated with a high standard of living, eduacation and medical facilities. Additionally, here most people that wander about the bush have an intricate knowledge of how to fallstall the circulation of snake venom or wear protective clothing or both. I always imagine a circumstance of being in a room 4 metres x 4 metres and which snake I would least like to be in the room with! A taipan would attack with absolute certainty in minimal time! I am not aware of any other snake in the world that would do this while having the fangs and the venom potency that the acknowledged experts give this snake. The black mamba is nevertheless a marvelous snake and I certainly would not underestimate it! However, I have read accounts of people who have had close encounters with the black mamba and they have sometimes not been bitten! I recall one person [an expert who collected reptiles in Africa for research and museums], stating he was in a position whereby he could not move [he was up a tree]. He opened his legs as best he could because a blck mamba was coming in the opposite direction. He perhaps was lucky in not being bitten! But a taipan would never tolerate such a close encounter and it would have launched its attack much earlier without fail whatsoever [Nb taipans are not found in trees and the close encounter would be at ground level].
    With all the talk about venemous snakes, in Oz we have a remarkabale snake called the King brown [although part of the black snake family]. It is called a king snake because it hunts other venemous snakes. This snake is also dangerous to humans [ususally placed about 12th in the world or thereabouts]. But its venom is the most toxic to any other snake [in the world]. It is also immune to elapid venom, and is the strongest and most athletic Australian snake. It easily kills australian snakes [which are mostly elapids] as are many overseas snakes such as the king cobra and the black mamba]

  • Black Mamba Wins // July 8, 2009 at 10:51 am | Reply

    Tim, I think you should read the 2009 book of world records. I WROTE THE ARTICLE. I have been a professional snake handler for 23 years. I have never seen a snake with a more toxic venom than the Black Mamba. I am an independent herpetologist, and sometimes travel to schools to do snake presentations. I am sometimes asked if I know about the LD50 of snake venom. I am very familiar with this, and have done hundreds of tests with both the Black Mamba and the Inland Taipan. The black mamba has always come out on top, with an estimated human LD50 of 0.37mg. The Inland Taipan has always had a slightly lower LD50 at 0.49mg. They both are extremely venomous, and should be considered dangerous. You also stated that the Taipan had the longest fangs of any elapid? I have yet to see a Taipan with fangs over one inch long. Also, you said the Inland Taipan was FRIENDLY??? They are very resistant to strike and would rather escape, but that does not make them friendly! Also, the Black Mamba has been known to chase humans. This is not just based on reports I have heard from African natives. I have had several close encounters with wild Mambas, and have been followed twice. I was once bitten and had to go to stay at a hospital for 3 weeks. For the first weak, I was suffering from paralysis, and was in a coma for about 4 days. Even now, 14 years after my accident, I don’t ever forget that terrifying experience. I will be happy to answer any questions you post.

  • Tim // July 8, 2009 at 9:49 pm | Reply

    I thank the previous [unnamed writer] for his opinions and his interest in snakes. I reiterate what I expressed previously [admitedly poorly], that you cannot lump the taipan and the inland taipan together as if they were one and the same snake. Although both are extremely venemous, the characteristics of each are poles apart. For some time I have had the opinion that the inland taipan wou;ld make a good pet [if it were not so venemous]. I have never witnessed one to be aggressive…inquisitive yes! However the taipan itself is widely recognised as the most aggressive venemous snake [if you enter its zone]. The other thing I attempted to explain is that there are actual recorded instances where individuals have had close encounters with a balck mamba and have not been bitten. On a percentage basis, I have no idea what the liklihood of being bitten would be! But the fact is that is does happen even if it is rare! In my lifetime, I have never witnessed or read [I am 63 years of age], of a single instance of any body encountering a taipan and it just slithered by! Similarly, I am not aware of a single instance of anyone accidently stepping on a taipan. They always disappear if possible, but if unable to retreat, they always mount their attack before either situation occurs. I reiterate, I am not aware of anybody getting close to a taipan without being aggressively attacked! The level of aggression has general recognition as being unsurpassed by any other venemous snake! The taipan is more closely related to the PNG taipan [off the north coast of Australia], which although smaller is similarly recognised as being just as agrressive. Also, the taipan [which is a more distant relative to the inland tapan], cannot have the size of its fangs compared! The statement I made about the taipan’s fangs has to my knowledge, universal acceptance and the statement appears in many recognised and authenticated publications over a long period of time! The othe subject raised was that of respective venoms. Well you have your opinion and you are entitled to it! The fact is that [notwithstanding your opinion]. both taipans rank above the black mamba in the majority of reputable listigs on the subject. On this subject, I can only be advised by academics who have previously studied these matters and have medical research experience. Also venom as a subject has many tangible factors not mentioned by Yoy.For example the chemical composition and that which it targets. In my view, one really needs to be a scientist to properly assess all the relevancies of respective venoms and I would suggest this total data forms the data upon which repsective potencies can be compared. I assume this is why the overall listings of reputable organisations place the taipan potency above that of the black mamba.
    In conclusion, the black mamba is lucky their are no king browns in africa. They would kill a balck mamba as quickly as they do a taipan!

  • Black Mamba Wins // July 9, 2009 at 10:13 am | Reply

    Tim, I do agree with you that many people often group both the Taipan and the Inland Taipan together and don’t stop to think if they are two different species. I however disagree with you when you say that the mamba is lucky there are no king browns in Africa. First of all, I would like to point out that the king brown lives in Australia, which is a continent that has a much higher annual rainfall than Africa. I would not want to take a king brown to Africa to see if it would survive the dry season because the last thing the natives need is another deadly snake to deal with. However, if the brown found it’s way to Africa, I am betting it would die of dehydration. Another reason I disagree is because I doubt the Brown could catch the Mamba. I mean, come on! Who can catch a snake that slithers 13mph (20kph)? Also, the Mamba is partially immune to elapid venom, and would most likely not die from a bite from the King Brown. The black mamba has a reputation it deserves, and no other snake can match it. Sure the King Brown, Taipan, Inland Taipan, Indian Krait and other snakes are extremely deadly, but they do not compare with the Black Mamba.

  • Black Mamba Wins // July 13, 2009 at 2:15 am | Reply

    The mamba also has a reputation for eating other snakes. I was once studying them in Africa, and saw one eating a full grown forest cobra!

  • dr.prasanth // July 13, 2009 at 4:36 pm | Reply

    good collection. but what about scales and their arrangements, identification etc……

  • Alun // July 14, 2009 at 11:50 am | Reply

    My question for Tim and “Black Mamba Wins” (unnamed writer) is are we talking about 1) the top ten most deadliest 2) the top ten most venomous ? If we are talking deadliest then surely The Inland Taipan is certainly not number one. If we are talking venomous then perhaps we need to see some scientific / academic evidence as you Tim have pointed out. Perhaps this data could be added on the site or in the posts so we can compare the LD50. I also noted that many lists contain the 10 species you have listed but many lists also contain the Black Mamba, several of these being official academic listings.

  • Alun // July 14, 2009 at 12:19 pm | Reply

    I also wish to add the following as a comment in the words of Brandon Cornett:

    The reason there is so much dispute over the most venomous snakes in the world is because people judge them by different criteria, and this inevitably leads to arguments.

    For example, some people build their lists of the most venomous snakes by using the LD50 test.
    Other people create lists of the most venomous snakes in the world by considering the venom yield, meaning the amount of venom the snake can produce with a given bite.

    Thus, you can probably find dozens of lists that claim to contain the “Top 10 Most Venomous Snakes” in the world, and many of these lists will conflict with each other.

    Another important point regarding venomous snakes. Many people create lists of what they claim are the “most dangerous” snakes in the world, and they will simply list ten of the most venomous snake as ranked by the LD50 tests mentioned above.

    But there is a big difference between a highly venomous snake and a highly dangerous snake. Many snakes that are high on the venom charts are shy and reclusive, and therefore account for very few human fatalities. How could you put such snakes on a list of the world’s most dangerous snakes?

    On the flip side of that coin, there are certain venomous snakes that, while they do not rank in the top-ten most venomous, still account for a large number of human fatalities each year. This might be because that particular snake is found in highly populated areas far from medical care, that the snake is comparatively more aggressive toward humans, or a combination of these factors.

    So the point is, one cannot make a list of the most venomous snakes in the world and refer to them as the “most dangerous” snakes … nor the opposite. They are two separate things, and they need to be treated as such.

    Just something to contemplate gents!

  • Black Mamba Wins // July 14, 2009 at 11:31 pm | Reply

    Thank you for your opinion Alun. I agree that Dangerous and Venomous are two entirely different catagories. As I have pointed out in earlier postings, the black mamba has a human LD50 of 0.37mg, while the Inland Taipan has a human LD50 of 0.49mg. These are not just from what I have read, but these are from the hundreds of LD50 tests I have done myself. The Black Mamba has the most toxic venom of any snake I have ever seen on land or in the water. Also, because it lives in some densely populated areas, it causes a lot of fatalities. It is (in my opinion) the most dangerous snake in the world because of its potentially very high venom yield (400mg), it’s high venom potency, its willingness to strike, and its agression. As I stated earlier, I is the only snake that I know of that WILL chase humans. This agression combined with LOTS of deadly venom (not to mention the longest fangs in the elapid world) make it the most feared, and most potentially dangerous snake in the world. This is my opinion based on my studies and experiences.

  • Steve // July 18, 2009 at 5:47 am | Reply

    Black Mamba Wins:

    re: “First of all, I would like to point out that the king brown lives in Australia, which is a continent that has a much higher annual rainfall than Africa.”

    I would just like to point out (from wikipedia, true, but still this is what is taught to all australian school children): “Compared to the Earth’s other continental landmasses Australia is very dry. More than 80 percent of the continent has an annual rainfall of less than 600 millimetres; only Antarctica receives less rainfall than Australia.”

    So I don’t think the dryness of Africa would be any problem whatsoever. In reality it would probably be wetter than the King Brown is used to…

  • Black Mamba Wins // July 20, 2009 at 6:52 am | Reply

    Not true Steve. Considering that much of africa is covered by desert, it is a very dry continent. In fact, I has received the world record for driest continent for many many years. And the annual rainfall is only one of the factors I pointed out. The King Brown couldn’t catch the Black Mamba, and couldn’t kill it. The mamba is immune to elapid venom, otherwise it could not kill forest cobras.

  • Black Mamba FAILS // July 21, 2009 at 1:35 am | Reply

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inland_Taipan
    “the most deadliest land snake”

    Checkmate.

  • Sssssnake // July 21, 2009 at 1:55 am | Reply

    The Black Mamba causes far more deaths than the Inland Taipan due to many reasons. Though thats not to say that its any less deadlier than the Inland Taipan. The Inland taipan delivers less venom however because it is far more potent than the Black Mamba’s, kills just as (if not more) efficiently.

    Baring in mind that the two snakes are in extremely different environments and behave differently, the kill ratio will vary dramatically.
    The Inland Taipan is located in central australia (the most arid part Australia – located far from the general human population), this snake is rather shy in behaviour, preferring to hide and flee rather than fight when in contact with humans.

    The Black Mamba is dispersed throughout Africa and has much contact with human, they are extremely aggressive and territorial and have been known to “chase” humans and animals at up to 12mph, they are also in far greater abundance than the Inland Taipan.

    I believe the definition for “deadliest” in this context is that “if bitten, the snake most likely to kill the occupant” as it cannot mean “most poisonous” (as the most poisonous snake is Hydrophis belcheri commonly know as the “Faint-Banded Sea Snake”) and cannot mean “the most deaths caused” (the pit-viper causes most deaths worldwide than any other snake — around 2000 deaths are recorded yearly due to this snake).

  • ClimateGuy // July 21, 2009 at 2:08 am | Reply

    The article on the climate of Australia in The Encyclopedia of Climatology gives the following facts:

    -50% of land receives less than 300 mm/year of precipitation
    -80% receives less than 600 mm/yr
    -Over 75%, the potential evaporation is greater than 2500 mm/yr
    -In central Australia the evaporation potential is around 4500 mm/yr, 20 times the actual annual rainfall

    Australia is the DRIEST uninhabited continent in the world.

  • Black Mamba Wins // July 21, 2009 at 2:26 am | Reply

    Wikipedia can be edited by ANYONE, and if you do the math from the information given there, the Inland Taipan can kill LESS THAN 2 PEOPLE! Also, I HAVE DONE HUNDREDS OF LD50 TESTS with BOTH black mambas AND inland taipans. The mamba always has a far more toxic venom, and delivers way more. It also has far longer fangs than the inland taipan, so it delivers venom more deeply, making it more dangerous. The definition for “deadliest” is what causes the most deaths. Since the inland Taipan has NEVER killed someone, it is not considered the deadliest.

  • james // July 24, 2009 at 11:22 am | Reply

    way to go black mamba wins….
    black mamba is surely the most venemous snake in the universe

  • ccdiver // July 25, 2009 at 8:25 am | Reply

    “The deadliest”, the most venomous, the most aggresive, the most common to bite, the probability of a bite delivering enough venom to kill… it is all conjecture..
    It just depends on too many factors to say that their is a “top 10 list”..
    I had that jerk Doctor from “Venom ER” at Linda Loma University Hospital tell me that a Brown Recluse Spider “Never Killed Anybody”,,, yert if you research the web there are plenty of Coroners who have documented deaths to the credit of this very common spider. Ironically the medical community does not have an anti venom for it, and all they do is administer antibiotics (which never work), and then cut out the infested area after it necrotizes to a scary proportion. After which it takes at least 6-8 weeks to heal, (often skin grafts are necessary), due to the inept treatment and the size the wound spreads to.
    If one immediately ( within 2-3 days), lances the wound and applys antibiotic cream mixed with sterilized activated carbon(charcoal powder), then soak the wound in a rich and very hot solution of epsom salts (elemental magneseum) inbetween re-applications of the antibiotic cream and charcoal… it will heal completely within several days.
    The antibiotic paste does nothing for the venom but will help to keep the open wound from becoming further infected when repeatedly re-lancing the wound and applying the charcoal and antibiotic paste. The epsom salts help to draw out the venom and the heat will help to coagulate the protein in its constitution. The most important thing is that the Brown Recluse Venom has an extremely high affinity for activated carbon, thus the charcoal powder draws it out miraculously..
    Activated charcoal capsules, available over the counter can reduce the chance of this venom causing recuring problems as well , as once bitten it never leaves your system entirely and can attack the bodies bone marrow or organs months or years later.
    It is a good idea to take a carbon pill daily for a month or two after being bitten as extra insurance.
    Another thing that a doctor who does have a lot of experience with recluse bites suggested is to take Nitroglicerine in small doses to increase oxygen and blood flow to the wound when it is healing, to help speed the healing.
    I would hold off on that for a couple days though to give the carbon a chance to suck out all the venom before increasing blood flow to the wound and therefore the spread of this venom to other parts of the body, since it can linger for so long before causing future problems.

  • harsh // July 29, 2009 at 3:46 am | Reply

    this is the best

  • raj // July 29, 2009 at 2:24 pm | Reply

    I think this list contains the 10 snakes which have the most toxic venom. But The name “deadliest” given here has been misunderstood. The taipan has the most toxic venom but is a very shy snake. So there are not many human casualities. Therefore it is not the deadliest but the one with the most dangerous venom for any snake in the world.

  • Black Mamba Wins // August 6, 2009 at 12:24 pm | Reply

    Hey ccdiver, we are talking about snakes here, not spiders. And for those who still don’t get it, the Inland Taipan does NOT have the most toxic venom. The Black Mamba DOES. This is a fact, not my own opinion.

  • Black Mamba Wins // August 6, 2009 at 12:25 pm | Reply

    Thank you james, for agreeing with me. It seems like you are the only one who does.

  • Sukant // August 12, 2009 at 1:49 am | Reply

    I agree that black mamba is the most dangerous snake,

    following are the features of black mamba that make it most dangerous:

    1. Speed & agility
    2. Ability to raise its head 6 feet above ground
    3. Venom
    4. Fierceness & multiples bites
    5. chasing humans
    6. Frequency of Human Encounters

    That all combines to make it the most Deadliest!!!

  • vivek // August 13, 2009 at 4:49 am | Reply

    hiii me wanting some adventure tripe to learn more about snakes dynast so any exert plz mail me, I always see discovary channel to see some beautifull snakes & i love then plz i realy keen to look forword plz contace me thank u

  • soumya // August 14, 2009 at 6:00 pm | Reply

    it is a verygood site to find out the most deadliest snakes in the world.
    the photos of the snakes are awesome exacly……………….
    i loved it

  • Manu kattappana // August 15, 2009 at 10:32 pm | Reply

    it is very very important facts for a person like me who are really loving snakes………..

  • Em // August 18, 2009 at 11:50 pm | Reply

    Hey Black Mamba Wins,
    I know I’m coming a bit late to this discussion, but if you wrote the article for the Guinness Book of records, then surely you have a number of references to back up your assertions about the Black Mamba? I know I’d be interested to read the sources you used to construct the article, as well as, I don’t know, the journal articles, or links that all the universities have made to your results, or hell even the mention on the Wikipedia page. I mean these are findings that are challenging long held beliefs of the herpetological community regarding how venomous snakes are. Yet all I’ve seen regarding this is your repeated mentions of the Guinness World records, and everything else I’ve ever read contradicts you. So you’ll forgive me for being slightly skeptical of your ‘results’.

  • zainab // August 22, 2009 at 9:12 am | Reply

    one of the snakes looked so cool it had oragne and yellow and black

  • Black Mamba Wins // August 25, 2009 at 12:26 pm | Reply

    Em, I was waiting for someone to question me about this. Unfortunately, as an employee for Guinness book of world records, we are not allowed to give out any info about contacts, records, research, fields, etc. All I can tell you is that myself and a team of 12 other herpetologists did the reasearch, came up with the same result, and published it in the 2009 Book of World Records. I’m sorry if this is of no help, but this is all I can tell you. I will be happy to answer any other questions (if possible).

  • Rob // August 29, 2009 at 5:49 pm | Reply

    I think people sometimes confuse most deadly with most toxic, this list was no doubt based on toxicicity, which is interesting in itself. The mamba debate / comments would be more appropriate in reference to a most deadly list, which in my mind the taipan (Oxyuranus Scutellatus) would top my list, and the Black Mamba (Dendroaspis Polylepis) would not be too far down on such a list.

  • pcos // August 30, 2009 at 3:07 am | Reply

    the ranking is for deadlist venom, not most venom, or most people killed
    test is completed by taking say 1 ounce of venom from many snakes and comparing them ounce for ounce for what they are – the mamba is a very large snake compared to most of the list and delivers more venom then most in a bit but ounce for ounce compared to the others – it did not make the list

  • Tom // August 30, 2009 at 3:10 am | Reply

    Lots and lots of “points and counterpoints”, which leads me to believe that interpretation of the question determines the answer. So my question and point is to have a list of the top 3 snakes most likely to bite me and kill me.

  • bigdick // August 30, 2009 at 3:11 am | Reply

    kill’em all …

  • max mosolino // August 30, 2009 at 11:27 am | Reply

    The most dangerous snake in the world is the one you are messing with! Many TV clowns have given people the impression you can just go and pick one up! Most people have no ability to identify one snake from another. The rule is, if you see one ,leave it alone if is not in a place where it can hurt someone. It has a job to do and wants nothing to do with you, Just go on your way.

  • Black Mamba Wins // September 3, 2009 at 6:38 am | Reply

    How immature can you get bigdick? First you have a retarted screen name, and then you say “Kill’em all”? you are undoubtedly a very immature person who has no love for animals. You clearly have no respect or appreciation for the wonderful animals god put here on this earth.

    You make me SICK!

  • don // September 6, 2009 at 7:51 am | Reply

    these creatures really suck!
    i mean they ar so damn scary!!congrats rangers u really doing gud jobs1

  • subharthi // September 6, 2009 at 11:47 pm | Reply

    i really appreciate steve for this informative site.i dont want to make any controversy,but i am snake lover,and many time i saw many programs in many tv channels but the ranking differs,i personally think the criterias to measure is different,i think they should mention the criterias on which they are deciding the ranks.being a snake lover,i am thnkful to steve for many information,his ranking is very close with others.i also saw many good duscussion in this site.

  • Troy // September 8, 2009 at 11:33 am | Reply

    Black Mamba Wins, the simple fact that you fail to even recognise that Australia is the driest inhabited continent shows you lack any scientific process or acknowledgment of existing research, let alone any common knowledge.

  • Appachan Ozhakkal // September 9, 2009 at 12:44 pm | Reply

    Same like human beings, snakes also have rights to live in the earth.Please don’t kill them.

  • Black Mamba Wins // September 10, 2009 at 7:43 am | Reply

    To clarify about the driest continent comment, Aswan, a city in Egypt is the worlds driest inhabited place and it is located in Africa. The worlds largest and driest desert, the Sahara, is located in Africa. Djibouti, a small African country is the worlds hottest and driest country. I apologize for the confusion I may have caused by saying Africa was the driest continent. I should have more clearly stated that the worlds hottest and driest places are located in Africa. But I still stick with my original statement that the King Brown would probably not survive as well as the Black Mamba in these places. And yes: the black mamba does live in every single one of the places that I have mentioned. And just to point out, the King Brown has been seen on the Australian island of New Guinea, which is the 5th wettest place in the world with an average annual rainfall of 182 inches.

  • Corvette Lover // September 10, 2009 at 8:02 am | Reply

    I agree with all those who believe the Black Mamba is the deadliest snake. It has, as Black Mamba Wins shared, the most toxic venom of ANY snake, and injects lots through fangs that are considered the longest of ALL elapids.

    Don’t want to change the subject, but What do you people think about the Chevrolet Corvette? I say Corvette ZR1 RULES! Once again sorry to change subject, but I really want to know peoples opinions on them.

    Thanks.

  • Rab Carr // September 23, 2009 at 5:28 am | Reply

    I let most of these snakes bite me for fun. What a RUSH

  • Chloe Nelson // September 25, 2009 at 5:57 am | Reply

    Helloo youu have give me so much information on this for my homework lol.

    Many Thanks,
    Chloe Nelson

  • Kevin // October 4, 2009 at 2:33 pm | Reply

    Corvette Lover -

    If you are interested on peoples opinions on corvettes, you might want to check out a ‘corvette’ forum, not a discussion on snakes.

    Just a thought.

  • Art // October 15, 2009 at 2:49 am | Reply

    You guys who are fans of Steve Irwin should check out this article:

    http://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2008/08/steve-irwin-was-big-fat-liar.html

    The article, “Steve Irwin Was a Big Fat Liar” states that Steve was a complete fraud and that Australian snakes aren’t dangerous.

  • jessica // October 15, 2009 at 5:35 am | Reply

    i loved steve but that sting ray i will cutbit up and burn it haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

  • Black Mamba Wins // October 15, 2009 at 11:21 am | Reply

    Yes it is true that Steve left off some information, but that does not make him a liar. It is possible, however, unlikely that Steve didn’t know that the LD50 test was for mice only. He also may not have known that Honey Bees killed more people than any other animal in Australia. My point is, just because he left out a little bit of information does not make him a “big fat liar”. However, as I have stated in previous posts, the Inland Taipan (Fierce snake) is not as venomous or as dangerous as the Black Mamba. Steve was awesome, but he didn’t know everything.

  • Haydn Lange // October 21, 2009 at 5:44 pm | Reply

    Re: Black Mamba Wins.

    I would like to know why Austin Stevens never had a Coastal Taipan in his cage or the other fellow that got bitten on the toe by a Death Adder while moving away …..a “Black Mamba”. A Coastal Taipan will “Always” attack when confronted with a threat in a confined space as that is their natural response when confronted with a circumstance like this with no avenue of retreat. These two people whose endeavours where motivated by charity would never have a snake of the Coastal Taipan’s nature in the cage as it will attack every time!

  • Haydn Lange // October 21, 2009 at 5:52 pm | Reply

    By the way that is no reflection on you or your appreciation and respect of the Black Mamba which is indeed a very formidable creature by anyone’s calculations!

  • Black Mamba Wins // October 22, 2009 at 8:52 am | Reply

    Haydn Lange, the coastal taipan does not ALWAYS attack when confronted. It is very aggressive, but not as much as the black mamba. The black mamba actually will CHASE people that cross it, not just attack. And you say I don’t respect the black mamba? Why would I study something if I don’t love or respect it? And no one else says anything about their respect for snakes, they just say which they think is deadliest and why. And you also have obviously not seen some of my previous comments. I have said that it is immature when people say things like “kill em all”, “kill all snakes in our way” and other things like this. I also have said that these people obviously have no love for the wonderful creations God put on earth. If you still don’t know if I like or respect snakes, including the Black Mamba, well I do, so that should answer your question. You don’t have to announce you like or respect something to make it true. And just to point out, you have not said whether or not you respect snakes at all, you just criticized me.

    P.S. I believe that the reason Austin Stevens never had a coastal taipan in a cage is because he only studies African snakes. As for the guy backing away from the death adder, I have no idea who you are talking about.

  • Haydn Lange // October 23, 2009 at 2:37 am | Reply

    Black Mamba Wins, I have just read your reply and woud just like to say that you have misunderstood my comments. I am not having a go at you or your liking of snakes or anything in general; I think by the number of your responses on this site clearly indicates your passion for snakes , particularly the “Black Mamba”. However I find it hard to fathom why all the sites I read about just about come up with the same conclusion that the “Inland Taipan” is the world’s most “TOXIC” snake! Are they all wrong???

    My initial comment about the guys in the snake hut trying to break the record was based on the type of snakes they had in their with them. Johannes Swart was the guy that just recently lost a toe trying to break the record and he was trying to brush away a Black Mamba but was bitten in the process by a Death Adder which was just behind the Mamba.

    As for my own experiences living in the southern part of Australia, we mainly experience Brown Snakes and Tigers which contribute to the most attacks because of their proximity to people. However, these 2 snakes live prodominately in the country areas and most people may not like them but respect them . The Inland Taipan is the most Toxic, but not very aggressive; being bitten by one of these follows is as likely as being hit by a golf ball trying to by some friut at your local market.

    However the Coastal Taipan is very aggressive in a cornered position but will retreat if there is an avenue to do so. If cornered, it will curl up into an S position and will strike if it’s perceived threat doesn’t vacate the premises.

    This snake is perhaps the closest to your beloved “Black Mamba” as it is very aggressive but probably as well misunderstood. It has been documented that many Australian Snake Handlers have found the “Coastal Taipan” to be very amiable after a period of handling.

    From what I have read “The Black Mamba” has also got some good wraps from people who are in the know with snakes in Africa.

    In general, I think snakes are fine; they have a definitive purpose in our ecosystem and their overall threat to people in a relative sense is minimal!

  • Black Mamba Wins // October 23, 2009 at 5:08 am | Reply

    Thank you for your clarification. What I still don’t understand is the comment about Hohannes Swart. How does that relate to the Black Mamba/Inland Taipan rivalry for most toxic snake? 2nd thing is that you said the Coastal Taipan will strike if the perceived threat doesn’t vacate the the premises. Correct. But it will not chase the threat, or, as Tim said in previous posts, attack the victim 100% of the time. It either tries to escape, like most snakes do at first, or it will stop if it can’t escape, and attack if the threat continues to come closer. It does not go after the threat if no escape can be found. It stands its ground and attacks ONLY if the threat continues to approach. And lastly, the Inland Taipan. This is one subject that gets quite annoying because I need to keep explaining why the Inland Taipan is not the most toxic. Most people who love snakes are familiar with the LD50 (Lethal Dose 50). This means that 50% of the animals that a certain amount of venom is injected into will die. This test is most commonly done on mice. The Inland Taipan’s LD50 for mice is 0.04mg of venom. The Black Mamba’s LD50 for mice is 0.06mg of venom. Inland Taipan venom IS more deadly to mice than black mamba venom. However, most people don’t know that the mouse LD50 is different than the human LD50. For the Inland Taipan, the human LD50 is 0.49mg. The Black Mamba’s LD50 for humans is 0.37mg. The Black Mamba’s venom is more toxic to humans than the Inland Taipan’s venom. I know this because I have preformed this test. Using nerves from a cedaver (both the Inland Taipan and Black Mamba have primarily neurotoxic venom), it is possible to measure the nerve destruction and estimate the human LD50 (we would never test this on actual humans). Also, based on the amount of venom needed to kill a Chimpanzee ( chimp DNA and human DNA are 99% identical) we can estimate the human LD50. I hope this answers your questions.

  • madison miller (snake lover) // October 24, 2009 at 1:33 am | Reply

    OMG, where’s the Cobra!!!! The spitting cobra or the king cobra!!!! I have ta agree with some people, where’s the mamba. O well, at least the Inland taipan is rite. that snake is a badass snake

  • Fatso // October 26, 2009 at 5:30 pm | Reply

    To all my fellow snake lovers, i would love to see one of those street performers charming a black mamba. From that day on i will have so much respect for these guys. For i will know for certain that they know how to take care of snakes.

  • naim khan pathan // October 31, 2009 at 3:45 pm | Reply

    the photos of snakes are very dangers im scared to watch such photos. its very nice to see the photos.

  • steve // November 3, 2009 at 1:55 pm | Reply

    Q :Witch snake has the highest human kill rate world wide ?
    Q :Witch snake has the highest toxic vemon per mg ?
    As there is to much conflicking info on the argument ( black mamba- taipan) and to many other factors , i would guess that one of the highest human populated countries would more than likey have the most humans killed by a particular snake in any case it may be a snake raked number 6 on the deadliest list that has this title , so its pretty easy for the snake experts out there come with the simple numbers of humans killed, and by what snake , then you would have the most deadliest snake , not really interested in what snake is the most aggresive , the longest fangs etc just witch snake has killed the most people for what ever reason it may be .
    we may get a suprise as i know the taipan would not come close as there is a very low population of humans around its inviroment , but we know the taipan has a very toxic venom , but that doesnt make it the highest HUMAN KILLER lets find this info so we know witch is the deadliest snake per human deaths!

  • nitin walmiki // November 19, 2009 at 4:10 pm | Reply

    that was totally impressive

  • Kevin // November 21, 2009 at 4:03 am | Reply

    To those questioning the ‘Black Mamba’ not being o n the list: The list is of the most ‘Venemous’ not the most dangerous.

  • Black Mamba Wins // November 22, 2009 at 8:52 am | Reply

    Sorry Kevin, but I have to disagree with you there. The list clearly says “Deadliest”, not “Venomous”. And even if it was a list of the most venomous, the black mamba should still be number one. If you don’t believe me, see some of my previous posts to see why. I really don’t want to have to explain it again.

  • Josh // November 24, 2009 at 2:15 pm | Reply

    Wow. I didn’t expect to find a site quite like this when I decided to research the current snake species recognized as the top ten for most toxic venom. When I first read the list, it seemed, and still seems, very plausible, in that it corresponds to previous statements and explanations that I have heard as to which species were potentially the most toxic. Then I started to read the threads. I was not hooked. I then skipped to the end and caught part of an argument, so I scrolled back up to where I left off and read the rest. After reading all of the submissions, I have concluded what I believe any logical person, especially a logical person with any higher education in biology would, in that there are many opinions, both with and without any credibility. Opinions, even opinions based upon certain studies and personal observation/experience with the animals do not need to be presented as “evidence of the true nature of the way the world really is.” Black Mamba Wins has presented credible evidence for his argument based on what seems to be an extensive study. Tim has presented seemingly credible evidence to support his arguments. However, no amount of experience, experimentation, or (and especially) argumentation can hope to reach a conclusion about the Truth (with a capital T). Studies and observation can only serve to enlighten us with certain information about how the world works/worked at that particular time. Even published scientific studies (I read a LOT of them, as I am a graduate student currently striving to earn a MS in Population and Conservation Biology), while VERY credible, do not necessarily tell us the Truth. One study can yield certain results, and the same scientists can perform the same study only to obtain different results. One thing that gives studies an order of magnitude more credibility is repeatability. If a group of scientists can obtain the same results consistently, and if others can perform the experiment and obtain the same results, then the theory is definitely sound, but still does not prove anything 100%. So far, the best argument I have heard on the matter (although I would tend to not agree, based only on what I have previously heard) is from Black Mamba Wins. He claims to have done the studies himself, and that he has results to support his arguments. However, since he can not provide us with a publication/raw data other than the Guiness Book of World Records (2009), we have no reason to believe him. And, it is important to note, that if he HAD presented us with a scientific paper that was written by 12 or so herpetologists/chemists/biochemists/medical doctors that are known to produce the greatest research in their fields, we still would not KNOW the true answer to this question. We would only have valuable evidence to help us to better understand the possible nature of the Truth. There are also many factors that can potentially make interpreting such studies ambiguous. For instance, every inland taipan will not have the same LD50. Nor will every black mamba. Nor will every canebrake rattlesnake. Furthermore, the same black mamba would not have venom of the same LD50 if sampled at different times throughout its life. The potency of venom can be slightly different based on many environmental factors. Snakes produce their own venom, so it would be ignorant to think that the condition of the animal at the time of sampling has nothing to do with its potency. Also, it is ignorant to think that all black mambas or all taipans (inland or not) will have venom of the same potency. It is also very ignorant to argue so passionately about the true nature of this topic. I tend to believe scientific theories that have proven themselves repeatedly, but I only believe them 95%, if that much. If evidence is gathered to refute previous studies of theories that have previously had a dogmatic following, it is the duty of those concerned to backtrack and re-visit the matter to try and gain more insight.

    So, the point I am trying to make is NOT that the black mamba is the most dangerous, venomous, or dangerous, nor is the fierce snake, nor is the beaked sea snake. The point is that it’s prudent for those concerned to seek information from published scientific studies rather than from a blog that anyone can say anything they want without any knowledge on the matter or respect for others (bigdick certainly doesn’t care to help others. He also doesn’t deserve the responses that some of you gave him/her, as this person is obiously either ignorant or desires to get some sort of negative response from the rest of you true nature lovers). Also, it is important to scrutinize the methods of these papers to see if they serve to answer the question(s) under study. If so, take the conclusions as evidence to support what may be the Truth, but don’t believe it 100% just because a scientist did some study that you know nothing about that results in some findings that you may not even understand. And certainly don’t think that the information posted here is supposed to accurately depict the nature of the question. This blog was meant to give an answer to the question of the 10 deadliest snakes in the world to the best of the author’s ability. I would certainly say that it is informative to the layman that knows nothing about snakes and wants a quick and somewhat accurate answer to this question. It is also informative to someone, like myself, that knows a lot about the natural world, and wants to see the current listings for such inquiries. To those of you that have your own opinions, you may be right. You may not be right. And if you’re right, you probably aren’t right 100% of the time, as this question is relative (one snake’s venom is more potent relative to another’s). Just enjoy the forum, learn what you can, and if you are not satisfied, research it yourself. Ater all, the more we know, the more questions we should have as a species with high mental capacities. I repeat, answers to questions only lead to more questions. And “research it yourself” doesn’t mean go to the Google homepage and type in “most toxic snake venom in the world” or “deadliest snakes in the world.” It may actually entail obtaining these snakes and extracting their venom and diluting it and seeing how dilute you can make it, and average, and still kill several mice. Or it may entail seeing the smallest amount of venom straight from the snake that will kill a mouse and doing some math to see how many snakes that particular snake can kill given the smallest amount needed to kill a mouse and how much they can inject with a bite.

  • Black Mamba Wins // November 26, 2009 at 12:57 pm | Reply

    Josh, the last little bit of your post is precisely what I have done. I used to just Google the “Deadliest snakes in the world”, and accept what the first site had to say. Now, however, I test these theories myself. As you have seen from my previous posts, my results tend to contradict what many others believe. Like you said, people are entitled to their opinion, and it may either be right, or wrong. I present my argument because I believe it to be right, based on my studies. Others tend to base there arguments on other peoples’ studies. This is why I get annoyed, because most of the posters claim something, but their only proof is research done by someone else. As you have said, everyone is entitled to their opinion, meaning you are too. I personally don’t think that a blog is to answer a question and only a question. I believe a blog is designed to give a possible answer to a question, and then, see what others think about that answer. Just curious, but what are your thoughts on what the deadliest snake is?

  • Lionfire // November 26, 2009 at 4:30 pm | Reply

    After all is said and done there’s is no doubt that in terms of aggression, strike speed and overall demenour the Black mamba is the deadliest and most feared snake according to most herpatologists and others who have studied aussie’s worst and africa’s most feared…

    The king Cobra is the largest most venemous snake and can inject large quantities of neurotoxic venom along with most other cobras.

    The Brown , tiger and taipan are extremely poisonous but dont have the speed of strike and reputation of the Black mamba..

    Im proud to say as a south african that we have the the deadliest snake in the world along with the biggest fanged,( Gaboon Adder) as well as the most posionous the boomslang…

    its all happening right her off my doorstep!!!

    Cheers,

    DAza

  • CHINMAY // November 26, 2009 at 8:19 pm | Reply

    THIS WEBSITE IS AWESOME.IT GIVES DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT SNAKES.IT HELPED ME GREAT.THANK YOU IRWIN!

  • Larry S // November 26, 2009 at 11:37 pm | Reply

    One must relize that this list is one person opinion but if you study this list as well as other regarding this subject you will see quite a difference in opinion who is truly the most deadly. Mnay list I have read do have many of the same members on it. hissssssssssssssss

  • shreya // November 27, 2009 at 1:14 am | Reply

    cool these r very dangerous snakes in the world

  • Haydn Lange // November 29, 2009 at 10:55 pm | Reply

    To Black Mamba Wins, sorry I haven’t responded back to you from your response on the 23th of October as I have been away. Your response was very informative, particularly in relation to the Black Mamba’s venom in relation to other primates, using Chimps as an example!

    In your response you mentioned:

    “The Black Mamba’s venom is more toxic to humans than the Inland Taipan’s venom. I know this because I have preformed this test. Using nerves from a cedaver (both the Inland Taipan and Black Mamba have primarily neurotoxic venom), it is possible to measure the nerve destruction and estimate the human LD50 (we would never test this on actual humans). Also, based on the amount of venom needed to kill a Chimpanzee ( chimp DNA and human DNA are 99% identical) we can estimate the human LD50. I hope this answers your questions.”

    Not being facetious, but how did you actually do this, because I doubt that you would have used live Chimps in the process.

  • Haydn Lange // November 29, 2009 at 11:06 pm | Reply

    Also in relation to your question Steve, I think you will find the Russells Viper to have contributed to the most deaths. Unfortunately it is due to its proximity to a high number of people working in agriculture in Asia and have relatively ordinary medical facilities to treat the victims adequately once bitten!

  • Haydn Lange // November 29, 2009 at 11:43 pm | Reply

    While I am on a roll, talking about aggressive not the most toxic snakes apart from the Coastal Taipan and Black Mamba there is another snake that comes into play called the Fir de Lance. When I served in the Forces, I met a guy that was in the British Army that served in Belize and he said this one was the most everyone feared because of the jungle work they did.

    This is bearing that most humans have a greater fear of spiders than snakes and they used to have a lot of large Tarantuala’s coming into their huts on a regular basis. This experience he said was hard to come to terms with to begin with, but after time the Fir de Lance was what most soldiers who had served there for a period of time had far more to fear from because of its aggression in the animal kingdom!

    I only mentioned this as a bit of interest being a snake blog!

  • Josh // December 1, 2009 at 5:20 am | Reply

    Black Mamba Wins,
    That’s great the the last part of my post is precisely what you have done. More people need to do that work for themselves. However, since you can’t give us any publication data, it doesn’t matter if you did the greatest study of all time. If the public can’t access your data, experimental design, and results, then it is null and void–sort of. I don’t know you, and therefore have no reason to believe anything that you tell me, unless I can verify that you are telling the truth. So, since you can’t provide me with literature, answer me this–Does the blurb on this in the Guiness Book of World Records, 2009 (or 2010, whichever year it is for) give specifics about who performed these experiments or at least how they were performed? If so, then your answer to this question becomes more substantiated and credible. As far as which snake I believe to be the most deadly–I don’t know. If we stricktly speak of potency of venom per cc, then it is a really tough question to answer, because you would need to perform these tests with many different species, and use at least 50 snakes of each species and maybe three age categories of each species as well, so like 15 hatchlings (5 years old) of each species. An adequate study just has not been done. You say you did a study, but how many individuals of eac species did you use? And what are all of the species that you used? If we are talking about DEADLY, taking into account potency, venom delivered, aggression, and human contact probability, then I would definitely have to lean towards the black mamba, realizing that the categories are relative and somewhat speculative, such as aggression.

  • Mithran // December 4, 2009 at 3:11 pm | Reply

    What nonsense, when I was looking through i was a little suprised and slightly annoyed to find so few snakes and so many comments, can you include a few more snakes, wht about the king cobra?? I think it definitely deserves a mention on this list.

  • Mithran // December 4, 2009 at 3:12 pm | Reply

    Very nice pics though, especially the boomslang!!

  • Hmmmmm // December 6, 2009 at 9:26 pm | Reply

    Snakes in this group all have one thing in common and it doesn’t matter where they come from.

    it is simply this … if you are bitten by any of them in the bush then put your head between your arse cheeks and kiss it goodbye..

  • Jake the Snake // December 12, 2009 at 7:35 am | Reply

    WoW, great informational site Thank You very much.
    But the truly number one snakes are the ex-wifes, belive me they are the deadliest ;-)

  • Cara // December 25, 2009 at 7:35 am | Reply

    This is very good information about the snakes and love the pictures =)

  • Alex // December 30, 2009 at 10:13 pm | Reply

    I adore snakes. When I get older I want to study Herpetology. How I got interested was this:I saw Steve do a preety dam good job so I thought I should study Herpetology.) Can some-one list down the worlds 15 most deadliest snakes and the worlds 15 biggest snakes PLEASE!!!!! …

  • g // December 31, 2009 at 12:49 pm | Reply

    so scary

  • podedhondhonepod // January 15, 2010 at 9:41 pm | Reply

    nice reasearch..

  • Raghvendra Gohil // February 5, 2010 at 5:44 am | Reply

    Where do you rank the King cobra if these are the ten most deadliest snake ?

  • Raghvendra Gohil // February 5, 2010 at 6:13 am | Reply

    As per me the correct ranking should be like this
    1. Hydrophis Belcheri (but its not terrestrial–if you don’t beleive see DK’S ILLUSTRATED FAMILY ENCYCLOPEDIA Edition 2007, Page No. 918, lower bottom under title ‘Most Venomous Animals’ and read the first sentence.)
    1. Inland Taipan (terrestrial world’s most toxic )
    2. Comman Krait
    3. Philippine Cobra
    4. King Cobra
    5. Russell’s Viper
    6. Black Mamba (also showed as fastest snake on world)
    7. Yellow-Jawed Tommygoffs or Fer-de-lance Pit viper
    8. Multibanded Krait
    9.Tiger Snake
    10. Jarararcussu

  • Raghvendra Gohil // February 5, 2010 at 6:20 am | Reply

    Black Mamba-
    For those who consider Black Mamba is the most venomous snake please check some data and please do a LD50 Tests (toxicity test) if you don’t beleive.
    You can consider Black Mamba the Fastest snake.

  • Black Mamba Wins // February 5, 2010 at 7:59 am | Reply

    Raghvendra Gohil:

    I have done hundreds if not thousands of LD50 tests on both the Black Mamba and the Inland Taipan. The Taipan comes out on top for the mouse LD50, but the Mamba comes out on top for human LD50. And please don’t make a list of the most toxic snakes in the world unless you actually test them yourself, as I have done. I have seen a website with the exact same results as you for 10 deadliest snakes, and according to my studies, it is wrong. Here is the link:

    http://kalyan-city.blogspot.com/2008/07/worlds-top-10-most-poisonous-venomous.html

    If you got your info from here or any other 10 deadliest snakes website, then please don’t go around telling people that you know the real order of 10 deadliest snakes, because you haven’t tested them yourself. Now if you have tested them yourself, then I am sorry for falsely accusing you of just using google to get your info. However, if you have done the research youself, I find it pretty hard to believe that you got the exact same results as that website I provided the link to. Please see my other posts for in depth reasons why the Black Mamba is the most toxic snake in the world.

  • Black Mamba Wins // February 5, 2010 at 8:05 am | Reply

    Based on my studies, I have made a list of the REAL top 10 most deadly snakes.
    1. Black Mamba
    2. Inland Taipan
    3. King Cobra
    4. Tiger Snake
    5. Boomslang
    6. Beaked Sea Snake
    7. Indian Krait
    8.Green Mamba
    9.Russell’s Viper
    10. Saw-Scaled Viper

  • Lionfire // February 5, 2010 at 2:39 pm | Reply

    as ive s said and will say it GAIN!!

    BLACK MAMBA IS THE DEADLIEST AND MOST POTENTIALLY LETHAL SNAKE IN THE WORLD BASED ON TEMPERAMENT, SPEED OF STRIKE, LETHAL NEUROTOXIC AND REPUTED FOR ITS PERSONLAITY!!!

    I n terms of venemous cleary Taipan and Brown snake win with Boomslang having very poisonous haemotoxin aswell

    Africa is the place to be chaps!!!

  • Black Mamba Wins // February 6, 2010 at 6:02 am | Reply

    Thank you Lionfire. Quite a few people on this site seem to be having a hard time understanding that.

Leave a Comment